From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: luajit recipe
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:37:55 +0100
Message-ID: <52F2D963.5030206@gmail.com>
References: <87iosulff2.fsf@gmail.com> <52F1948E.1080308@gmail.com>
	<87bnyl8y2g.fsf@gnu.org> <87eh3hxfpn.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47925)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tipecaml@gmail.com>) id 1WBD00-0001Wz-DI
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:39:29 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tipecaml@gmail.com>) id 1WBCzr-0004pU-F4
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:39:24 -0500
Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]:47168)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tipecaml@gmail.com>) id 1WBCzr-0004pK-96
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:39:15 -0500
Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id n12so823182wgh.12
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:39:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87eh3hxfpn.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: guix-devel@gnu.org
Cc: raimonster@gmail.com

On 02/06/2014 01:11 AM, Raimon Grau wrote:
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> I think you should add this package to gnu/packages/lua.scm rather
>>> than creating a new file.
>>
>> Indeed, I had forgotten about that file.
>>
>> Raimon: could you post an updated patch that does that?
>>
>> Ludo’.
>
> The releases of one or the other are not synched at all, and there's
> fewer and fewer relation between both implementations, but it probably
> makes sense to have them in the same file (as in scheme.scm).
>

Yes. For instance, we have a file named 'version_control.scm' in which 
we put VCS that have nothing in common :)

Cyril Roelandt.