From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sree Harsha Totakura Subject: Re: Gnunet-0.10.0 recipe Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 01:18:31 +0100 Message-ID: <52F031D7.4090101@totakura.in> References: <52EA7F73.9010302@totakura.in> <20140130223912.GA12116@debian> <52EAD88B.70409@totakura.in> <52EAE140.8090805@totakura.in> <20140131085355.GA4396@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> <20140203221717.GA23992@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43511) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WATip-0000Ui-Np for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 19:18:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WATij-0000kB-PS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 19:18:39 -0500 Received: from mail-out1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de ([131.159.0.8]:54975 helo=smtp1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WATij-0000jv-Iu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 19:18:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20140203221717.GA23992@debian> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, "Grothoff, Christian" On 02/03/2014 11:17 PM, Andreas Enge wrote: > Just one last question: Is there a reason you did not add libmicrohttpd as > an input? Or should I add it again? I had forgotten to add it, nevertheless it should be added to the inputs as it is a direct dependency. But how did the build succeed if libmicrohttpd were not listed in inputs? > > The "official" description printed with "make sync-descriptions" is different, > but in fact adds only this sentence: > The package includes gnunet-gtk, which provides a GTK+ graphical user > interface to the GNUnet service. > I think here the official description should be changed. First of all, > what is "the package"? And as far as I can tell, gnunet-gtk would be a > distinct package. The official GNU description and synopsis for GNUnet seems to be not updated in a while. It stresses only the file-sharing application while it has now newer applications like GNS and Conversation. Christian, could you please update those? Sree