From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Roelandt Subject: Re: Python Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:25:00 +0200 Message-ID: <52333C5C.4010008@gmail.com> References: <20130913154607.GA5258@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VKWWL-00082H-7b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:47:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VKWWF-0003Li-Oy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:47:01 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]:53643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VKWWF-0003La-He for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:46:55 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p61so1371938wes.40 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:46:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130913154607.GA5258@debian> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On 09/13/2013 05:46 PM, Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello, > > recently I added a few more python packages, and things seem to work well > (except for the surprising realisation that more projects than not seem to > still depend on python 2 instead of python 3). So I do not expect big changes > to the python build system in the near future. This does not come as a surprise to Pythonists, unfortunately :/ > > I considered switching from python 3.3.2 to 3.4, but the available versions > are 3.4.0a1 and 3.4.0a2, which does not inspire too much confidence; maybe > we should wait for 3.4.1. > See http://www.python.org/download/ : we should stick to 3.3.2. > So I would suggest to merge the branch python into master. I did a test > merge, and there were no conflicts. > > What do you think? > I agree with you. Cyril.