From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id oEM3Jlf3Cl/SYAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 11:43:19 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id wEneIVf3Cl+ufQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 11:43:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C3A0940225 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 11:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57242 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1juaO5-0002Fs-O1 for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 07:43:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1juaNP-0002Fj-Rf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 07:42:35 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:43973) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1juaNO-0007Q5-1n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 07:42:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1594554150; bh=JK/HF5hstb//NQImXibL2RpxI8zThujP+b/DhyzBJPI=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=J834DK2LpxJsyq6tubBy/hwWuRAnvtXtyPMtND2HFmM8E52anOXjJbbM/BVTajkIG /lQttkRmZVHeizB9PSWBNNH7CIgOphAgjGUbO6ugApeyxNpWdTomgWV+0b0JyzLr81 00h7cOVRB/6lLG9c4XUSN0YrPcFwQIhmlcCGyc5c= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([88.152.184.127]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLgUx-1juJ7u3yLL-000ubJ for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 13:42:30 +0200 Subject: Re: Pushed a fix (?) for ACL key location To: guix-devel@gnu.org References: <877dv98q1z.fsf@dustycloud.org> From: Jonathan Brielmaier Message-ID: <522d8a75-a2ba-d6a0-908f-a6e5029c3309@web.de> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 13:42:29 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <877dv98q1z.fsf@dustycloud.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:5O/rgchTJDHH9mSz4GIuvypUfIFsK9ayTWMnElD6gnKVWIz+RU2 bL5luD5DgbzG8X31pVnL3NoY0AshaH5U2XJTwTPtGKL6ogLgSjp4XOTMRItzaN36BoKzZhn f99wAgdF6Awl/RHa4CpC7phHde0/bZRzl1GaQF0r1CsiX5uCD7TAALUoJ9qqQ7kEEX9stmu YOnPq9J3o8+kzn2bkOsOw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:vKxwwTxnZYc=:QRxEP2r27GpgX1zRpvhFQZ nCN+REhCr4ZPELZDggfitk0y1ebs43nqUbgMSnPnghF6dl0WfwlNS7dDUvJKN8XDgs72dySBZ FkLwU4n9GsVENeArogiB/tCqw8WuYH5xjdGypyldFMgOxP1j6AeO1nbA+yb9bufEGHklvXUJM SSNfS7mZGIOJSJrFuUNbyRgjHowHthx2NZy86dC1tNAtg9zGqTATZgSSSMc0SuKow7gJ+SIK+ qF3H2tmZdNGhHJbi371R2Kh29nCYvcTx6CKTW1L0wm6xLHzJK+KFv5uiCJRmC1oEttIN8lqBR 2Tdow//j4kMdsp0ZTS3LoW1lHy9pp0zqYdUVjEDcbNWyH4SZ6zPNx+1E2Cc5q/x/o57l4NhyR Hfi7tvd271ILXTiZ49Lx2ZaUZoLbCZ59AN/y5Qr9WMp6I7QvRNreAsc7lP6Tr6l3mOaHWJ2ph 7oUGZz0TsDCuHKXV2xYgWDdG1LtTt0h4zci93gZspMAGGKEjMsNREUZ5t3zIEn7U5OKt2wVqV TGPv5hDGjvIOO42ygUG30MWvsgNsqSQ4U2BYpcqBoaIl62fk/KJlAE2d8Us1zcjaJLExnHl2+ 4HgHEnZXK4RcQFFs3MVQZ6kagMykqP/zBllMXTbvodkcgSIx/ObQqbzvzNSu/7RmkYIx8a60L 1ONNHpyQ+xhnUKC56G2Mez9RaAXzFP48PVvptuARgp+LFKR2C5LN6GSVyFFI2kZIUEkuepLY4 sjwgEG/VoIKxkosOQsuxRwM+1TwFVNvoKbvLtUaBxz2lDH75Xbh9MH7oW54CJIZ6LVnEVMOXq EI3RIsJ1sjLzGfGqc+ODRiJa1nsu+LKw7uu3mefWxzi+TN3kPq61qwwqX20enK9WRJ+NZTFK2 ge7geMWGFzU+0knIIfoo9LgmCU87NvfIvNbqIE6H//mihFWbJeChhn5isoj0jRcpt8hcaeB9E mj/uOTDmERJ300fknAEsfD+j2gCjxePyj0SiMQvtvluum1F9+djzrHmvcRke0DCZ/WQje+St/ L3vziq6VCd+mH8xJGIh65/kV2YP72XmoL42wboIVm+JBwpoPIZRw7SCUVy+CDGs1VpQeps4vl Tee8QB4H0vT9t+5bwGH+HOHSQpDnaQWjejYCQAfNc6FsEnQVvGt/rMnjvzimx4ZlPWRuZXBcA CLFSyBXMJmXtE7BCVKsXUstCIf0ZuKZV0it/vVJGaBGpcIHWQTizCi2DfojUZFjP8CVZAucSR XNdy9GaHFV6rmoBS/qYYejrtuGPAaZrcI2glDNA== Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.72.192.78; envelope-from=jonathan.brielmaier@web.de; helo=mout.web.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/12 07:42:30 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -37 X-Spam_score: -3.8 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=web.de header.s=dbaedf251592 header.b=J834DK2L; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.21 X-TUID: TiFVjb9fPNpy On 12.07.20 03:44, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > Commit 6680880f9b8dceb4f2f3f91bd2b13c659b53835e pushed out a new version > of Guix, and it looks like it wasn't possible to build new systems from > that because the filename for the "Berlin ACL key" changed. (Or at > least, I couldn't run "guix system vm".) > > I pushed out a "fix" for this. I hope it's ok. Thanks for the fix. As I ran into all those little errors with `guix pull` this week-end, I wonder if we can do better. So maybe some pre-checkin CI which tests that a commit/commit series doesn't break `guix pull`. What do you think? Is this doable? I find those little errors pretty annoying as they seem to be avoidable through technical counter measures...