-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 2013年07月08日 19:55, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "BlueT - Matthew Lien - 練喆明" <bluet@bluet.org> skribis:
>> checking for the Guix system type... x86_64-linux
>> ./configure: line 6755: syntax error near unexpected token `GUILE,'
>> ./configure: line 6755: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GUILE, guile-2.0 >= 2.0.5)'
> 
> Yes, you need to have pkg.m4, as provided by pkg-config, in the
> ACLOCAL_PATH.
> 
>   http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/2013-06/msg00037.html

Yes I do have those packages and files installed.

bluet@GuixOnUbuntu64:~$ dpkg -la|grep -P "(pkg-config|autoconf|guile)"
ii  autoconf                          2.68-1ubuntu2
automatic configure script builder
ii  guile-2.0                         2.0.5+1-1                    GNU
extension language and Scheme interpreter
ii  guile-2.0-dev                     2.0.5+1-1
Development files for Guile 2.0
ii  guile-2.0-libs                    2.0.5+1-1                    Core
Guile libraries
ii  pkg-config                        0.26-1ubuntu1
manage compile and link flags for libraries
bluet@GuixOnUbuntu64:~$ dpkg -L pkg-config |grep pkg.m4
/usr/share/aclocal/pkg.m4


>> 2. guix-0.2
>> Test begin:
>>   test-name: "package-field-location"
>> Test end:
>>   result-kind: fail
>>   actual-value: #f
> 
> You’re using Guile 2.0.5, right?

bluet@GuixOnUbuntu64:~$ guile --version|head -n 1
guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.5-deb+1-1

> Can you try the patch below, run ‘make check’,
> and report the “;;; (name” and “;;; (version” lines from test-suite.log?

Hmmm there's no line with keyword 'version'.

bluet@GuixOnUbuntu64:~/guix-0.2$ grep -P "(name|ver)" test-suite.log
;;; (name #<<location> file: "gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm" line: 188
column: 5>)

(log in attachment)

>> Test begin:
>>   test-name: "filtered-port, file"
>> Test end:
>>   result-kind: fail
>>   actual-value: #f
> 
> I believe this has been fixed:
> 
>   http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/2013-07/msg00031.html

Ok I'll test it once I can remove the blocker in Git version of Guix.


> Note that it’s safe to install Guix at this point.  From there you’ll be
> able to just run ‘guix pull’ to upgrade to the latest Guix from ‘master’.
> Incidentally, you’ll be able to actually use it to install packages.  :-)

I see.
But I'd be more comfortable to see a software passed all tests before
installing it. :-P


> Thanks for testing!

Love to help FLOSS projects. :-)

But I think I'm kinda annoying to you about these bug/issue reports.
I almost feel I'm dumb 'coz I can't do more debugging/bug-fixing with
scheme.




Best wishes,
BlueT

- -- 
/ Just another [ Perl | FOSS | Security ] Hacker. /
/ BlueT = Matthew Lien = 練喆明 /
/ http://BlueT.org /
/ GPG: 4A293CBD /
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlHa8uwACgkQvRNvgEopPL1KbACePYZ1Adztt+KwjA5wOlS1XsLF
ZBQAn28i2N4rEe0iI6uYvkBLYDIax3BK
=Uz2s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----