From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pinoaffe@airmail.cc Subject: Re: Brainstorming features for issues.guix.gnu.org Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:34:02 +0000 Message-ID: <4eaa6c8dff009f0a86ef2f183d07db28@airmail.cc> References: <87mu83xzzr.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37606) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jHkRR-0007Sw-OV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 04:34:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jHkRQ-0004th-SZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 04:34:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mu83xzzr.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: Guix-devel , Guix-devel Hi! On 2020-03-26 08:49, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > What do you think? This interface looks great, but I don't quite understand what it lists, since it doesn't seem to list all patches submitted to guix-patches@gnu.org. What is the criterion applied here? Might it be useful to reconsider said criterion? pinoaffe