From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id gGUICPOrcWW7OQEA9RJhRA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 12:26:43 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id gGUICPOrcWW7OQEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 12:26:43 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCB36678F7 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 12:26:42 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=msavoritias.me header.s=20210930 header.b=P0albqHl; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=msavoritias.me (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1701948403; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Y0dm0z4qvO+Q+kG9QjdSfIWkYFL/I3ihZMy76EBxxkA=; b=sU+B9432Z+HOvLidy2rqI9G5cc85uFDOlTazIMK9+KfzWozOi2Ul9UMXehiPrCNyhM1JBf y86u6YSuNBqJ9xEu4I1oRThG/VaBEsBKYjgcjvmLQAII4WCms6Q5ztsja/wxw3nz70l1p1 UWMpWVJc6+A1okMo4GFpw8D67L06yBAOPvm+674GQ7B8KREMJr6rq0iUMwa0KWpn1vGmY7 2wrf6cKlZQHfL4xZw9+lgTzCCxivJ/2HkbqfEQz3poKmTiwdSLj7vmiOUCD4AUPWIsxHd1 Je5hR57lp9t9oYBktDT9c0aTLo81gqiw47dV0F4GOqtTeRL52StQ4SrKffdvLw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=msavoritias.me header.s=20210930 header.b=P0albqHl; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=msavoritias.me (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1701948403; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=nIkvlpj13l1RnTq76UegJWz4JavnW433DUju9HROkjYFkZleTR+0ehoxGFPXo2076Hr9Ov jT3OAzy1fdNSxAwLUxh7nGVyyfJxw/6OewyZlqPrIiFFL6qS7fZBkdmN8dDXu3xGCQUZMg 5Q2CyPdDpjGxfYk+RjA9pRLtwHpnST4fM5/M8Aswl0fvdzq49MKKcm3izdddp8wqZzqjrS ZclrLBK345Ugy8Z+DxncsbfM3C4Sh/jBZ2k7LXP6ZMH5I0FYtLrCNfkE+ztH6p/Q1YLNMu yOOZKGAEy+8UEsJhy1SUQZSToci0q6OEtmr3v/ggGiY61oDhnwa+lKWbudqzFA== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBCWB-0005d9-T1; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 06:26:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBCVx-0005YX-4p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 06:25:58 -0500 Received: from mail.webarch.email ([81.95.52.48]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBCVr-0001zM-Mk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 06:25:54 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 63AE01A8C4DF; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 11:25:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=msavoritias.me; s=20210930; t=1701948339; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=Y0dm0z4qvO+Q+kG9QjdSfIWkYFL/I3ihZMy76EBxxkA=; b=P0albqHl/FD8iYvxR0BPBTxCjw0NPxCdgVE7F6hhXKAXE9xE4ZYqwhuCdRZlPq1nLdC0wF XWRUoiZk9+njuBfGRkYT1JMD3YsSyN/DQ1XZdubSpNcMzDc+ddPUGJKOcQ6JFt6t7Bnxwj Qjx9WwDRio5NUixdqD/NQzd91YOE8Nz2n7yLZxYev/4Uf+skC1VjwTxisXojSMaOGzhEO9 QZKZ16pTAIyammlYrXHuPqfwdA5VwdgtnMu15RlygqFzFJ3lYqX4bO/hR9XQWqUvnXJE+H PXQPsZpjzWVx5Bf8SpjDtNlOn4jV/+qY5mMK6z8lYlGYiONCwzSjgK98wNgV2A== Message-ID: <4a10827f-3070-07e2-06c3-50f052343c6c@fannys.me> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 13:25:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Subject: Re: Add xmpp room to the list of group chats. To: Ada Stevenson , guix-devel@gnu.org References: <22a86322-a348-92fd-786b-f82a3cdda466@fannys.me> <855d727d-ea56-4547-6d3f-5281d0c61591@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: MSavoritias In-Reply-To: <855d727d-ea56-4547-6d3f-5281d0c61591@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.95.52.48; envelope-from=email@msavoritias.me; helo=mail.webarch.email X-Spam_score_int: -56 X-Spam_score: -5.7 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-4.02, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: DCB36678F7 X-Spam-Score: -6.05 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.05 X-TUID: EtiEErLS6clJ On 12/7/23 09:42, Ada Stevenson wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/2/23 8:20 AM, MSavoritias wrote: >> Hey, I thought this mailing list is the most fitting for the request >> feel free to point out if its better somewhere else. >> >> >> Is the community open to have group chats listed in other networks >> than IRC assuming they are free software? >> >> Having chat groups in different networks is going to greatly improve >> the accessibility of the project towards new contributors which I >> think we recently wanted to start working on as one of our areas of >> focus. >> >> The group chat I am talking about is in xmpp/jabber and it is here -> >> guix@chat.disroot.org >> >> It has already the CoC of the guix project and xmpp is free software >> from server to client. >> >> >> Also disclaimer: I am not talking about starting to bridge them. That >> is an entirely separate thing with different tradeoffs and maintenance. >> >> Just listing the group chat is easy though :) >> >> >> Msavoritias >> >> > This sounds like a good idea to me! XMPP just works a lot nicer with > stuff like attachments and message logging without needing peripheral > tooling like znc to get around things like message > logging/persistance. Whether we go with disroot.org to host the chat, > or whether GNU can host something for us in the future I'm not sure, > but I'm keen to see more usage of XMPP. > > I think the channel should be listed once we have a strong consensus > that we want to use XMPP as a main communication channel. Perhaps this > is suitable for a RFI? > Why main communication channel? I mean sure we can have a discussion regarding that, but I think that brings far more questions than just listing the xmpp channel as an alternative. Plus we don't even know how desirable it would be for it to be the main channel? (Although a lot of people have started to appear in the channel which is nice ^^) The model I was looking at was similar to -> General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software. - ziglang/zig github.com Community <#> General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software. - Community ยท ziglang/zig Wiki ๐Ÿ”— https://github.com/ziglang/zig/wiki/Community > However, I understand the desire to keep everything as central as > possible, especially when it comes to communication. IRC works well > enough in most cases, and by far has the most active users. This > doesn't mean things can improve, though, and the niceties provided by > a more modern protocol such as XMPP could be worth it, potentially. > Anyway, there isn't much harm in maintaining our own XMPP channel for > those who wish to use it. > What is being proposed here? hosting our own xmpp server or promoting this as an "official" channel? whatever that means. MSavoritias > What do you think? > > Thanks, > > Ada (adanska) >