From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: Merging staging? Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 19:27:25 +0000 Message-ID: <45C58E09-6345-46E2-A0D4-769008ECF2BF@flashner.co.il> References: <20181223140048.GE2581@macbook41> <20190109162729.GA18849@macbook41> <87h8eh7ibc.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghJVz-0006kI-Ex for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 14:27:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghJVy-0000WR-HS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 14:27:47 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:40070) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghJVy-0000Uy-BH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 14:27:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87h8eh7ibc.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On January 9, 2019 7:15:56 PM UTC, Mark H Weaver wrote: >Hi Efraim, > >Efraim Flashner writes: > >> I merged master into staging today and got the following chart: >> >> | architecture | berlin | hydra | >> +--------------+--------+-------+ >> | x86_64 | 42=2E2% | 78=2E8% | >> | i686 | 28=2E2% | 64=2E3% | >> | aarch64 | 0% | 23=2E0% | >> | armhf | 16=2E8% | 50=2E4% | >> >> but compared to master: >> >> | architecture | berlin | hydra | >> +--------------+--------+-------+ >> | x86_64 | 57=2E5% | 91=2E9% | >> | i686 | 44=2E4% | 77=2E8% | >> | aarch64 | 0% | 41=2E8% | >> | armhf | 30=2E3% | 69=2E6% | > >Something looks wrong here, because Hydra has never supported aarch64, >i=2Ee=2E it does not create jobs for that system and has never been >connected to an aarch64 build slave, so I don't see how it could >possibly have more than 0% coverage on that system=2E > >> So I think I'd like to see a comparison on hydra of staging vs master >> and if it's good enough we go ahead and merge > >I just asked Hydra to produce another evaluation of 'staging'=2E When it >has finished doing so, we'll know more=2E > > Thanks! > Mark And I thought I triple checked I had them in the right columns! --=20 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E