From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rennes@openmailbox.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add libzapojit. Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 07:59:51 -0600 Message-ID: <40322f17c87a911d6621a9fbfa070c37@openmailbox.org> References: <58ba5d1146752af014230febb2fd2c49@openmailbox.org> <20160225011441.GA31607@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46863) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYwST-0002MA-W7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 08:59:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYwSQ-00082F-O8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 08:59:57 -0500 Received: from smtp12.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.46]:38017) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYwSQ-000828-Fb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 08:59:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160225011441.GA31607@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On 2016-02-24 19:14, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 04:25:37PM -0600, rennes@openmailbox.org wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> i attached libzapojit patch for review. >=20 > Thanks for the patch! >=20 >>=20 >> This is a library for accessing SkyDrive and Hotmail, necessary for >> documents manager(GNOME apps). >=20 > Is the documents manager already packaged? >=20 > If so, I assume libzapojit is working for you? >=20 > If not, I might want to merge it anyways to encourage further work on > GNOME stuff by everyone :) >=20 >> * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (libzapojit): New variable. >=20 > [...] >=20 >> + (build-system gnu-build-system) >=20 > I can't tell =E2=80=94 should it use glib-or-gtk-build-system instead? = It seems > to build fine as-is, but I wonder because it uses some GLib stuff. >=20 > Looks good aside from these questions. Hi, GNOME documents is not yet packaged, I started packaging requirements,=20 in this sequence. GNOME documents has several requirements not packaged.=20 or what is the best strategy to do so? Thanks