From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id MBeeCwY6il/kYAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 00:25:42 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id wDhuBwY6il9zTAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 00:25:42 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C082E9404CE for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 00:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42460 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTa2W-0008QE-Mu for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 20:25:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43734) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTa2N-0008Pu-6A for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 20:25:31 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:35275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTa2K-0003Np-Ro for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 20:25:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e78b17b3; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 02:25:24 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=IY 0lX6OvyfH8C/x+XVlooQ1toR8WpsKghJeO4pty4bg=; b=mkOSBp1QZMvpyca3TM pZonYU7fCJt870U8Ly/GLqrqTPI+hiUsPqYJ+4FEPU6JnC4GbyRRUGY8AqNWR577 jLeWevy8celi+2EQmzrIdITefyNK8ewws3ns6K23dCIRdMfteZY1+WvAaLrmX836 h2AjCLMSEhmvziSOS7+7zXbpeJeJJun/erAOWmpYdKJL45gGSY8aYwR5hfXsQZcb lH2hb3M1O+SNHz2ZTK8SSPyPQKggjDdnDeRP4AuZemWqvnzyYRDjDm4vQ6xyMdDl 3OhQdUrqm961xRxvR6RGNTQglbqzGYgGRJeAS+WaQiV+ZsbAH2bmDqmB9AzgcrBG 7JnA== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0987e69f; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 02:25:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 9b1143ca; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 02:25:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e58c6f23 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 17 Oct 2020 02:25:23 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 00:25:23 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.14.0a From: jbranso@dismail.de Message-ID: <3d0ea90a13ff6104ce685c25256c190c@dismail.de> Subject: Re: Using #true and #false everywhere? To: "=?utf-8?B?TWlndWVsIMOBbmdlbCBBcnJ1Z2EgVml2YXM=?=" , guix-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <878sc5lta5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <878sc5lta5.fsf@gmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/16 20:25:25 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=mkOSBp1Q; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.71 X-TUID: 5CRVkZlg9gVU I use "f" for followup. That works for me. :)=0A=0AOctober 16, 2020 6:0= 8 PM, "Miguel =C3=81ngel Arruga Vivas" wrote:=0A= =0A> I didn't send this to the list... I must start using S L always inst= ead=0A> of R and changing the headers manually, sorry. :o)=0A> =0A> ---= =0A> Hi Ludo,=0A> =0A> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes:=0A> = =0A>> Hello Guix!=0A>> =0A>> As discussed on IRC recently, several of us = think that using =E2=80=9C#true=E2=80=9D and=0A>> =E2=80=9C#false=E2=80= =9D instead of =E2=80=9C#t=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9C#f=E2=80=9D throughout o= r documentation and code=0A>> would probably make it easier for newcomers= to decipher that.=0A>> =0A>> WDYT?=0A> =0A> I think that it could help t= o the reader.=0A> =0A>> This syntax is supported since Guile 2.0. =E2=80= =98write=E2=80=99 still uses the=0A>> abbreviations, but the good thing i= s that it means we can change all of=0A>> gnu/packages without triggering= a single rebuild.=0A> =0A> This is even better. :)=0A> =0A>> As for the = manual, I=E2=80=99m afraid it=E2=80=99ll make every msgid that contains= =0A>> @code{#t} stale. So maybe now=E2=80=99s not a good time to make thi= s change?=0A> =0A> It may be a big issue with a release in one week, but = on the other hand=0A> the msgids would break just after releasing...=0A> = =0A> Maybe other translators have a say.=0A> =0A> Happy hacking!=0A> Migu= el