From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rennes@openmailbox.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add libfilezilla.
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 20:41:07 -0600
Message-ID: <3c7b4c5e7d26adfc4898e06aea82976b@openmailbox.org>
References: <20170209163618.1759-1-rennes@openmailbox.org>
	<20170209163618.1759-3-rennes@openmailbox.org>
	<87tw7y4yh8.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35971)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rennes@openmailbox.org>) id 1cd6a2-0003FM-OR
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:41:31 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rennes@openmailbox.org>) id 1cd6Zx-0002xD-Ry
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:41:30 -0500
Received: from lb1.openmailbox.org ([5.79.108.160]:57158
	helo=mail.openmailbox.org)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rennes@openmailbox.org>)
	id 1cd6Zx-0002wR-Ix
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:41:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87tw7y4yh8.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Hello Maxim,

On 2017-02-12 20:26, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
offering/offers/ or s/offering/provides/
> 
>> +    (license gpl3+)))
> 
> Only license information I could find is the COPYING file which is
> GPLv2. I think gpl2+ would be more appropriate.
> 

grepping libfilezilla directory, i see glp2 and gpl3:

libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/depcomp:# the Free Software Foundation; either 
version 2, or (at your option)
libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/compile:# the Free Software Foundation; either 
version 2, or (at your option)
libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/missing:# the Free Software Foundation; either 
version 2, or (at your option)
libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/config.guess:# the Free Software Foundation; 
either version 3 of the License, or
libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/ltmain.sh:# the Free Software Foundation; 
either version 2 of the License, or
libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/config.sub:# the Free Software Foundation; 
either version 3 of the License, or
libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/test-driver:# the Free Software Foundation; 
either version 2, or (at your option)
libfilezilla-0.9.0/configure:# published by the Free Software 
Foundation; either version 2 of
libfilezilla-0.9.0/COPYING:    the Free Software Foundation; either 
version 2 of the License, or
libfilezilla-0.9.0/m4/ax_check_link_flag.m4:#   Free Software 
Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your
libfilezilla-0.9.0/m4/ax_check_compile_flag.m4:#   Free Software 
Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your
libfilezilla-0.9.0/m4/libtool.m4:# published by the Free Software 
Foundation; either version 2 of
libfilezilla-0.9.0/m4/ax_append_flag.m4:#   Free Software Foundation, 
either version 3 of the License, or (at your
libfilezilla-0.9.0/README:the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 
of the License, or

Should I put both?
Thanks