From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id yFbUL4C0ol9tRAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 14:02:40 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id YHayK4C0ol8+IAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 14:02:40 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EFDC9404D3 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 14:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53406 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaJN1-0004oY-D4 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 09:02:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaJMp-0004kh-1v for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 09:02:27 -0500 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:7393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaJMl-0005W1-IB; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 09:02:26 -0500 Received: from nijino.local (217-149-162-161.nat.highway.telekom.at [217.149.162.161]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CR7d06cfDz1LWpg; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 15:02:12 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4CR7d06cfDz1LWpg DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1604498533; bh=CAHrk1eiL+stCfOmhWVYtmog26Tp78h2WqasLOU5FWc=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Sa3I4VlrzZQ9lB/TnDw6JibGYn+ZOWBXX+L+nl6Go9WDo2fyNlg0I4mMGLHbKoSqE cjSIP4yWi8vfuYK6za9IGqlSWSBga/3z9hFNoDkjMLPPoy4QHglVwAXPPKVI1742rY zBohzSczEsFk3pekbDeQSQS+/dymR3hj3rPw/jkI= Message-ID: <3717888bbc4ea8b129880a89dfa916e1e134b84f.camel@student.tugraz.at> Subject: Re: GNOME in Guix From: Leo Prikler To: Danny Milosavljevic Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 15:02:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20201104144350.68cc6d24@scratchpost.org> References: <9324ae97b8c1c2452386154d56922558b8274812.camel@student.tugraz.at> <20201103101430.711ce21a@scratchpost.org> <898d3e29025888a0d218ddf8b468a676ece2490f.camel@student.tugraz.at> <20201103202416.628375fb@scratchpost.org> <20201104090815.05654315@scratchpost.org> <6ea08f910493be04f088db1ac6b98b1ecbd6d968.camel@student.tugraz.at> <20201104144350.68cc6d24@scratchpost.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.117 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=129.27.2.202; envelope-from=leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at; helo=mailrelay.tugraz.at X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/04 09:02:19 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=tugraz.at header.s=mailrelay header.b=Sa3I4Vlr; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=student.tugraz.at (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.59 X-TUID: vAnxlFYWguGI Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2020, 14:43 +0100 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic: > Hi, > > On Wed, 04 Nov 2020 10:45:06 +0100 > Leo Prikler wrote: > > > But we already know all this from our earlier discussion. > > I *know* you already know that--but "we" don't. I want someone to > actually > proceed further, because I cannot. Hence I posted this on guix-devel > (for the first time with an easy short recipe to follow). Ah, okay. I'm still a bit confused, given how verbose that recipe was, but I get where you're coming from. > Thanks. That is what I wanted to know. > > I tried guix environment -v 99 -d 1 and it adds nothing useful, > especially not > how the other libgobject got in there. > > So I still want to know. I think some important information gets lost here, because you already built most of the packages. You could try garbage-collecting them and then start anew, but then you'd be building the entire profile at full debug info. Interestingly, nothing shows up for the generation of profile.drv, which might indicate, that there are not actually two packages in there. It's at least a bit suspicious. Having received the path of the profile.drv, you might now want to look at what packages it references (recursively), specifically all mentions of glib. (Use emacs-guix for quick navigation through .drv files.) For the record, in case you forgot to note the .drv, my profile containing glib-with-documentation and gobject-introspection is /gnu/store/cl1wz5wsgjy208n330z4p9f5kljzixp2-profile.drv Regards, Leo