From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Bavier <bavier@member.fsf.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] packages: Add zip archive support to 'patch-and-repack'.
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:06:49 -0500
Message-ID: <35397f148fac2e6ab8aaa186499002d4@openmailbox.org>
References: <1427212612-24293-1-git-send-email-bavier@member.fsf.org>
	<87iodq15o4.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9t9p6ux.fsf@netris.org>
Reply-To: bavier@member.fsf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40428)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bavier@member.fsf.org>) id 1YamtZ-00024k-Hu
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:07:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bavier@member.fsf.org>) id 1YamtV-0002OF-IJ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:07:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87h9t9p6ux.fsf@netris.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On 2015-03-25 08:03, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:
>=20
>> Eric Bavier <bavier@member.fsf.org> skribis:
>>=20
>>> * guix/packages.scm (%standard-patch-inputs): Add "unzip".
>>>   (patch-and-repack)[decompression-type]: Detect zip archive.
>>>   [build]: Invoke "unzip" when appropriate.
[...]
>>=20
>> OK to push with these changes!
>=20
> This is for core-updates, right?

Yes, I pushed it on core-updates.  Mostly because it uses the=20
gexp-rewrite that Ludo did on core-updates.

`~Eric