From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: License MIT? Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 23:23:45 +0100 Message-ID: <2ef0858c-4d7d-05fb-3a34-e42e581082d0@tobias.gr> References: <87mvfn7gmr.fsf@xsteve.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qtSmRrgJtRg31AGGEH69NHnEWjTgOA3Sp" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKBm6-0000EL-TJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:23:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKBm3-0004YB-QN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:23:46 -0500 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:36825) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKBm3-0004WS-Is for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:23:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87mvfn7gmr.fsf@xsteve.at> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: stefan@xsteve.at, guix-devel@gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --qtSmRrgJtRg31AGGEH69NHnEWjTgOA3Sp Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="LfNBovQ7ELQd6CoQVBAVVq9Io9BEDVhBs"; protected-headers="v1" From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: stefan@xsteve.at, guix-devel@gnu.org Message-ID: <2ef0858c-4d7d-05fb-3a34-e42e581082d0@tobias.gr> Subject: Re: License MIT? References: <87mvfn7gmr.fsf@xsteve.at> In-Reply-To: <87mvfn7gmr.fsf@xsteve.at> --LfNBovQ7ELQd6CoQVBAVVq9Io9BEDVhBs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan, On 22/12/16 23:17, Stefan Reich=C3=B6r wrote: > However I didn't find MIT in licenses.scm. The name =E2=80=98MIT licence=E2=80=99 is considered ambiguous by (amongs= t others) the FSF[1]. This is probably the =E2=80=98expat=E2=80=99 licence, which you w= ill find in licenses.scm. Kind regards, T G-R [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License#Variants --LfNBovQ7ELQd6CoQVBAVVq9Io9BEDVhBs-- --qtSmRrgJtRg31AGGEH69NHnEWjTgOA3Sp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEqBAEBCgAUBQJYXFJxDRxtZUB0b2JpYXMuZ3IACgkQkczbm0hUG5lO5AgAo5n9 FW+SLvD6AyfKTp/9M0NP57/BSOexE6w0KeurdOTZtbpJUGLlt7QLm4bVvmd7iyX4 9cPX21UcuPbt7MCqbBxq42oeUyn4/pl4Nknsz/pTgpDmQudRamrJduEq3VIJzFka LCnnfuy1dj4SHbC3WHOjjfvP40UCJLfWz1wjns1tGN05Qyngbr6cObSaUzGYqY35 ZzGi1adYI36pDETDzBSUEDbZBOhRq7ZKig4sYR+3ACxEFH7GYpPOlUvMWbr5ambh XmOu5WDvPIrBrqBP9+Uf9aeacoFvqygGDmYC/RL96ZNswvImEg2O1fNK8g5OQCV7 9q1MpdRZyLOmz2l6sA== =UUK1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qtSmRrgJtRg31AGGEH69NHnEWjTgOA3Sp--