From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id GExoJDRTgWHSowAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 16:03:16 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id aFwMIDRTgWEEDQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:03:16 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E7D6D17 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 16:03:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33296 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhvJi-00005x-DF for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 11:03:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhurp-0006FM-Ag for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 10:34:25 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([2a00:5884:8208::1]:54824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhurk-0007b2-J2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 10:34:25 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 5ac43bef; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 14:34:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date:from :to:subject:in-reply-to:references:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim; bh=p0xLYIDptfz+ bt5pkqNoMKsE9YoQfN9tjWfnE7YUDHY=; b=WJdfkgo6Xfbw8onMLCJ2gRFQVLgy uKV6mSDjS28kSOubocHW+nSQ1mCz85rQPUOfbY3mkHGaNCJYedV9AExtA7OQxu59 F/joB3amzsR9b8mqFyJBupY53KEBhzYMgvjaddIrpr2Rua7Q4WYSmUNSL7J5QsgT mVNVFruz5WMbC3GtZF7/qgnmbEEIs88nGj2ZbUKGIVh951g5WNFix/3OpWVtYhTo kRTfECXwSXZhjDpyXGWB7YzLUFvJlJco2EYHNnuIZ35qM2SosDdcOGDgKSkrOUFi Oan4OTmJsH2uJHAXqsIH/sTnXfm0lRa78EIGAzn/AygpVr3i+csq0CUeXw== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a9d97ddf (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 2 Nov 2021 14:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 10:33:58 -0400 From: Julien Lepiller To: guix-devel@gnu.org, zimoun , Muhammad Hassan , Guix Devel Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_Request_to_use_GNU_guix_reproducibility_bugs_?= =?US-ASCII?Q?data_for_research_project_=7C_University_of_Waterloo?= User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <86y266yde8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86y266yde8.fsf@gmail.com> Message-ID: <264E47F1-6985-4FDD-A9CF-5A68AB7FDAE3@lepiller.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=----69RSQLYT8Y3Q2ULJB3J0NYHP3YA287 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:5884:8208::1; envelope-from=julien@lepiller.eu; helo=lepiller.eu X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1635865395; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=XvrT9ne5wGmWYIuSiWXdBf2jDWI6LhJHgmg7qfn+GeA=; b=Ow0bn9jKtA9Bo6qcpUN1CmebB3oeOkXrX2lfj9mPKgVI7T3xPc7LxIO/Q0jExFIlNYksT2 qKmliFEhG2UlTUuRmllK9Rsp7njgkc/YewwYjaXK6B2UGfVnkd7kXMltyTRLikgYIQiQmu oIHwkYpGSW+jee3pgCCo3OlXN/i5smWDNAFHQHKX2Lc1x4Ik64aXnDJmujllPt9Emkc4C3 YWmv5jx/tSAOQcDGstlkgYjnJ8EPF1Bl8qgIrQiSydZf9aIMI/FAwG+p1uBJx8njzv//q4 ssl4HnYRKz2jDh0x4ASPSrZKzY6XCt2Wb/PPWbGlidVhTCFbFPxxlYhVmBs0xg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1635865395; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=HIf0lGw9dBxHFW5+HQ8D+RSHSjxGv3AJWYC1oHnYZ5wzqUB6SxEzuFk8N8eXeO17C4NmAT FjugSMPJYDFymx6oR/qj+CKvOkmMVE009/HMDVcFOYjlrKm3XOOmTcFlnBhjICgXa2UdrZ q+D4kdVfcEeJDVo48Ta6qq/tj8RX8Uteeo5gyTvRK1Av6/DaFriuAOV1JdtWNpayYDvyIA Gt7/iRqSHHVZQI8cOhbM9r6ntbJRQ37irZ9R4WwyW9AnfeTOIqf9oJVE7q4tXF9cI/84Sa RjAKGpg5k7xL0SPIpkM+hyWEqxvsjCgej9Thn+ANvDWU3beYBQHEydsDr31+Cw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=lepiller.eu header.s=dkim header.b=WJdfkgo6; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=lepiller.eu; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.42 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=lepiller.eu header.s=dkim header.b=WJdfkgo6; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=lepiller.eu; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 54E7D6D17 X-Spam-Score: -0.42 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: p+p+gokNp0ZT ------69RSQLYT8Y3Q2ULJB3J0NYHP3YA287 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The guix data service also has some info on reproducibility=2E See data=2Eg= uix=2Egnu=2Eorg (Select master, the latest processed revision, and add /package-reproducib= ility to the URL)=2E This page compares between berlin and bordeaux=2E There are a lot of unknowns because the build farms haven't both built som= e of the packages, so we can't compare, but of those tgat have been built o= n both sites, we can already observe some interesting differences=2E Le 2 novembre 2021 08:01:51 GMT-04:00, zimoun a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: >Hi, > > >On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 16:48, Muhammad Hassan wrote: > >> I would like to scrap reproducibility bugs data from the linked >> website to use in my research project that is being conducted at the >> University of Waterloo=2E I am a Master's student=2E > >Nice! Thank for your interest to Guix=2E > > >> The project aims to provide automated support for non-reproducibility >> detection=2E > >Non-reproducibility can be large=2E Against which one are you working? > > >> Please tell me if there is an API that I can use to scrap the data=2E > >For instance, =E2=80=9Cguix build --no-substitutes=E2=80=9D followed by = =E2=80=9Cguix build >--check=E2=80=9D allows you to locally build and rebuild for checking if = the >build is reproducible =E2=80=93 bitwise speaking=2E Then, =E2=80=9Cguix = challenge=E2=80=9D allows >to check your local builds against the build-farm=2E Note that two >build-farms are available [1,2] for various architectures=2E > >The Guix project runs a Data Service to collect various data=2E This >service serves a JSON API (not-really documented but roaming on IRC >#guix helps ;-))=2E One year ago (already, damned!), a tiny and drafty >script to somehow get the reproducibility coverage was around [3]=2E I >have not worked on it since then and I do not know if it still works=2E >Perhaps, it might be an entry-point for working on reproducibility data >from Guix=2E > >Feel free to ask more details=2E > > >1: >2: >3: > > >Hope that helps, >simon > >PS: I close the issue since it is not one, IIUC=2E Instead, let redirect >to the mailing list guix-devel which seems a better place for discussing >such request=2E :-) > > ------69RSQLYT8Y3Q2ULJB3J0NYHP3YA287 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The guix data service also has some info on reprod= ucibility=2E See data=2Eguix=2Egnu=2Eorg
(Select master, the latest proc= essed revision, and add /package-reproducibility to the URL)=2E This page c= ompares between berlin and bordeaux=2E

There are a lot of unknowns b= ecause the build farms haven't both built some of the packages, so we can't= compare, but of those tgat have been built on both sites, we can already o= bserve some interesting differences=2E

Le= 2 novembre 2021 08:01:51 GMT-04:00, zimoun <zimon=2Etoutoune@gmail=2Eco= m> a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
Hi,


On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 1=
6:48, Muhammad Hassan <muhammad=2Ehassan@uwaterloo=2Eca> wrote:
I would like to scrap re=
producibility bugs data from the linked
website to use in my research pr=
oject that is being conducted at the
University of Waterloo=2E I am a Ma=
ster's student=2E

Nice!  Thank for your interest to Gui=
x=2E


The projec=
t aims to provide automated support for non-reproducibility
detection=2E=


Non-reproducibility can be large=2E Against which one =
are you working?


http://ci=2Eguix=2Egnu=2Eorg/>
2: <http://bordeaux=2Eguix=2Egnu=2Eorg/>
3: <https://lists=2Egnu=2Eorg/archive/html/guix-deve=
l/2020-10/msg00181=2Ehtml>


Hope that helps,
simon
<=
br>PS: I close the issue since it is not one, IIUC=2E  Instead, let redirec=
t
to the mailing list guix-devel which seems a better place for discussi=
ng
such request=2E :-)


------69RSQLYT8Y3Q2ULJB3J0NYHP3YA287--