From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id IJiNHuFFdWZeAwAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:20:33 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id IJiNHuFFdWZeAwAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:20:33 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=msavoritias.me header.s=20210930 header.b=GiS3VDIy; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=msavoritias.me (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1718961633; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=TE0At0M2b7725SolxbcUGklNTNxM3XRuta5Aqrl4Dcw=; b=p0vYm25UT9HDh/f2f6cnHla3Mw55guYxEZ6jjmX4MmDMNAIiUErCD1rMF/ATWj7fr8p029 O97y1uIhya9M8Abf5d8l32Rvu/fRiwwuTb7WQZbv5gW872uOJPGJjPt3qtwg7S23OPzViM igV0orFPWoYZLGNxrBfiyUywSK56w8Qdg/58FKKwc/HY/GHZC6g1WfvmpzYk8hExQ3qakN ia7V8AuFyOiMZfv8MuGXrcUE87d99Tx+W//hIOE0lS9HBiHHMYEiCOcyCl3dgJV3/KH/Bd X28si3tRuBJ/H3LtTScexJzsuQr8SHOkk7cThLvN5JH6pbLIeMygKPsMGCK/3A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1718961633; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=s7SFIw0bBStR+1tpXS6q/D4wTdVttX2Lb6kz9HpqUtuxVE1YH8z8evu2qewd8dVC79o8TR LbOPW8ilfZOsH60RWCfLpSZdY5ACbeCio8Hi+WeZt3iJf7byONN/T+CZQeuJG50kIDkV5Y cSFuMkFdTr1XT2LW3aY+nPFnUVEpZzPHnLgr0+EMdi7V2LhVBCr0N4t6bj5vsbLrWVPyni HGPMdj9iGFEJBz/GTBD3FELqSGa506yhoqc0nYxHwMvpReDYs0xkzD/jWEvBk+w3wIowlr o9hNqgvGUDS9u3aVnIH3u+o8DW6KnYior1/9oNlyIQ4Gl+J5k11rcR8suWucWQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=msavoritias.me header.s=20210930 header.b=GiS3VDIy; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=msavoritias.me (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47EB974678 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:20:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKaQw-0002Ob-GG; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:19:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKaQv-0002OS-SY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:19:49 -0400 Received: from mail.webarch.email ([81.95.52.48]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKaQu-0005A9-Ba for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:19:49 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id E7E371A8874F; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:19:43 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=msavoritias.me; s=20210930; t=1718961585; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=TE0At0M2b7725SolxbcUGklNTNxM3XRuta5Aqrl4Dcw=; b=GiS3VDIy/ht5vm/cW0Lm+PtYwKWCvqdwHS/+2b+aVDe/c3TeN0JevQmX6T4kFH9LUMtEq/ o+pmTshSJkqg1EL60o1fK9ccqWQXXvD47Z+48Ma7i3o9x4jVuxN8czqb36xDKUrXrfyVqm fiCpAKshE2pf0SFTNnE1ZJs77cLs7DRDjJ1uF8zDkbKZ9p96MbuL+g4i2Q35RUlEyMPdy2 V9OVlcAmwdNlIpkKCdkUh5V+un9HDk9+x1KIRCzV9FtR4iuyP4Rs1QOxaGY+ydtZODN89F I5bfOn89qATwUk4cFlaU1YBciRWTHPC7Ztp6SqafYWbDv1skWwNVxidI/SgmIw== Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:19:41 +0300 From: MSavoritias To: Dale Mellor Cc: Ekaitz Zarraga , Andreas Enge , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Next Steps For the Software Heritage Problem Message-ID: <20240621121941.78a6db15@fannys.me> In-Reply-To: <8c9da9051b126ed3ef25905bd0ec166c7c54818d.camel@rdmp.org> References: <20240618113717.4a6bad2b@fannys.me> <8734pa5mlx.fsf@meson> <077b1a0fdec4d0f30209c28d75dc40811c77a4a9.camel@rdmp.org> <24a0a840a595dfba7c145e5f207fef532ceb16d6.camel@rdmp.org> <8c9da9051b126ed3ef25905bd0ec166c7c54818d.camel@rdmp.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.95.52.48; envelope-from=email@msavoritias.me; helo=mail.webarch.email X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.26 X-Spam-Score: -3.26 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 47EB974678 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: mn80wKz55fR9 On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:41:10 +0100 Dale Mellor wrote: > On Thu, 2024-06-20 at 22:59 +0200, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2024-06-20 22:54, Andreas Enge wrote: > > > Am Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 07:42:44PM +0100 schrieb Dale Mellor: > > > > I'm sure guix lint tried to push my code out to them the last time I > > > > tried. > > > > > > Ah indeed, there is this in guix/lint.scm: > > > > > > So it does not push code, but a URL from which the code can be downloaded. > > > Thus it requires the code to be available from the Internet; local code > > > is "safe" from SWH. > > But this is still leaking information. > > > > Now I do not know what will happen if you save your code as a git > > > repository at a hidden URL. For instance, does SWH check the license? > > > I would hope so. > > Hope is not really good enough, there needs to be certainty in this. > > > > > For this specific case we could add some flag to the command line like > > `--do-not-archive` or something like that. > > `-x archival` does it, but it is too easy to forget and once the cat is out > of the bag privacy is lost. I really think this should be default behaviour, or > at least there should be a flag in the package definition. I would still be > uncomfortable with the last option, as everyone would be relying on the > collective of Guix maintainers to not screw up and accidentally leak private > data. > > Dale Yeah very much agree this should be the default behavior. Archiving should be opt-in to avoid any surprises for the person running it. I am surprised it became default actually. MSavoritias