From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0pmGEILSGGI9jAAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 13:58:42 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id WOyqC4LSGGJXOgEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 13:58:42 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1C341E464 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 13:58:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59350 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nNaBD-0005Z9-IL for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 07:58:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nNZvT-0005aE-H0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 07:42:27 -0500 Received: from mail149c40.carrierzone.com ([209.235.151.149]:45408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nNZvN-00035U-Uu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 07:42:19 -0500 X-Authenticated-User: bokr@oz.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=carrierzone.com; s=mailmia; t=1645792925; bh=WvhA7k/vvY5dWG16GIb+ZoVjpHiezGrDamWO1qURdbw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XAuWkwErp/8BevFtJHOXk+AuF/neeh6Hnu9boCOFWBG7QNLJU2iWi9tkZPSNVtENq fy1yHqb2uI3HAGbgKm1vVA89KQacegiQyTNUBx9oM7+0lTesFwL6yeC8SqNhxiF6Zr 5y6GDAYjvBF2Zbg9LT2Qtw3MHicm5CfiCaPiprVE= Feedback-ID: bokr@oz.net Received: from localhost (m83-185-34-232.cust.tele2.se [83.185.34.232]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail149c40.carrierzone.com (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 21PCg0KI011011 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Feb 2022 12:42:03 +0000 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 13:41:47 +0100 From: Bengt Richter To: Christine Lemmer-Webber Subject: Re: Excessively energy-consuming software considered malware? Message-ID: <20220225124147.GA15296@LionPure> References: <2067ba1e606855eace261fd0b0ae9721b369bbd5.camel@telenet.be> <70fb056bcfa1570525b9c7153de883506c51d1ce.camel@platen-software.de> <5558617e-895b-4fd0-02c4-775a94cab648@becze.org> <42f2d7aa-6c6b-370b-0536-9b69d54c1b6f@crazy-compilers.com> <87h78n945c.fsf@dustycloud.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h78n945c.fsf@dustycloud.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A742F29.6218CE9D.003D, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Rules: X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-Origin-Country: SE Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.235.151.149; envelope-from=bokr@oz.net; helo=mail149c40.carrierzone.com X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Bengt Richter Cc: Martin Becze , guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1645793921; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=KCsngcPGFDl2OikpB0LaSXMc/BS4vgcYQhoenIsEmz0=; b=KiRCB16DR3ayk234VzUBNymADYA8gj2JTUS+Xjes3yALrSt/fvpb70mGbpXrb/V3un+x5i M8SJBsEW+4M5CHSW1wN5louaQ1xkA4VqfLyIDnmPRQpkvSmRhLBzrcRWlXy91VEYp3wOPV /lwFTfQhx+iQpMgdEUtIK/mL0FiI9dY28sYElWTmMxMmvTAvMW0DVNLYF6GPgrfeAlmqwq WcIYRlF9qF00i0UzpRv9lLWc7rnZ9itJBC1s9zR4K85KZZOdaQ3jUL6WWllaQqgfY2/PvZ ZgZlvkAEgNSQVk+aIDyw5cob7KGhrFdCqY9BU7k+NjaP67ioV0YkofI/bySmTQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1645793921; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=EzWrKuU2QhWChLYbvBeL9Y8p/KWi2UpnAUc0+TU/XG8ElTxh+YwQWovrKdKKN0P8I7Ty2H UwZe3D7RB9vrggeRFCzCsANY/Kn51n3mQTussQCTp7J19+rm5i4UbZcYvjatrWIemlR5A/ rAhtMuGBnj/GnOqNGOGvAuLRgC7H+zp9HxhBFBaTr7YxF1YS3ZQHMW3h19dnFfeFqEtCv6 J2YWdftI/90sGi0ZG4izpd8yfPvv4mHOvJSnMamZWtJgcOz9X+7UyrsTPIJ1QKjyXul78j MK44hFC8bV8CMx8hEQgUUc09SF1rKIjMq+x895K0/g79b1+EIaEPdcQBBFdLxg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=carrierzone.com header.s=mailmia header.b=XAuWkwEr; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -8.13 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=carrierzone.com header.s=mailmia header.b=XAuWkwEr; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E1C341E464 X-Spam-Score: -8.13 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: lG1fXh3aeTdY On +2022-02-24 19:27:37 -0500, Christine Lemmer-Webber wrote: > I am all for these conversations; they are good to have as a society, to > examine our social foundations in earnest dialogue. But I think they've > approached a point on here where they're no longer about Guix > development, in particular, so probably should be moved off-list. > WDYT of starting a list called "guix-off-list" to provide a place for those who enjoy this kind of discussion? I do enjoy such discussions sometimes, but not on the same plate as debug tracebacks or beautiful code examples from the virtuosos. I don't mind single-line BTW or FYI or IMO: footnote references to out-of-thread content if the rest of the post contributes something and isn't just one line in a full quote. Having a "guix-offlist" would enable a reference like "IMO:guix-offlist: bitcoin explained by me ;)" And maybe also a mailing list called "guix-grownups" -- where casual adult language is accepted without triggering endless complaints. Coming to some mailing lists these days I sometimes feel like I've entered a restaurant where the menu is dominated by allergy and spice concerns. (I have nothing againt special venues catering to sensitive minorities, don't get me wrong. What do I mean "minorities" eh? :) Wonder what George Carlin (R.I.P) would say about all this :) -- Regards, Bengt Richter