From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id MNsXI3abC2K9XAAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:24:22 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id sJbFG3abC2IoEwEAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:24:22 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B7413BA39 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:24:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55072 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJwsX-00046Y-8o for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:24:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44678) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJwrq-000362-FY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:23:38 -0500 Received: from imta-37.everyone.net ([216.200.145.37]:35864 helo=imta-38.everyone.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJwrn-00047r-IZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:23:37 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0004962.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21FC8dlc013070; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 04:23:22 -0800 X-Eon-Originating-Account: NXU_aHYdIa4mRyOhK7xQJhdwiBwomMr71eHOdrGcyRU X-Eon-Dm: m0117124.ppops.net Received: by m0117124.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 53b92129) id m0117124.61e9ed5a.2aab82; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 04:23:21 -0800 X-Eon-Sig: AQMHrIJiC5s56GmtUwIAAAAD,d7f34c10d7ecbf540b9b135eb8b44f3b X-Eip: 4hcdDaC85pmrb8zHcveSXhhiiv4wpFLNsdkzF4z3tAM Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:23:13 +0100 From: Bengt Richter To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: Assisting reviewing & committing with tags? Message-ID: <20220215122313.GA12713@LionPure> References: <33b265a7265bb849e1bfd483d6558635bd439061.camel@telenet.be> <87fsp1z7yd.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fsp1z7yd.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: GSmQxpwpyzKgJGGjd8gE5rzM2TE5Zba3 X-Proofpoint-GUID: GSmQxpwpyzKgJGGjd8gE5rzM2TE5Zba3 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.816 definitions=2022-02-15_04:2022-02-14, 2022-02-15 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=625 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1034 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202150070 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.200.145.37; envelope-from=bokr@oz.net; helo=imta-38.everyone.net X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Bengt Richter Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1644927862; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=SbY1CixTigKers0mlie/+Ioy2QgfjCu4ihGg6FGlK4Y=; b=OwiV28HaWxIOPYY65JGoL0engBbSaMSqmUzeVb8BRT7I972qkrhOsMI9pmtyjBSIflNt1M uEi45pYNgSLj8FfDaeFmkqz3633GCw7KTRb79MCuOynw7Dencpc6gFVyL7DHeP+LUdMoEx sCx3ZX252rKvqyat0/K0EsvT1eIPXp70EbFi16FHxbaf55wCznaCR84ub3RrGryo8Eubhq AHdBFamrqaQThyIcrPi7UJ1cU+XDEJ8dxn60Y/yEyIzv36+Q+cM4fX7jkVjZ179dCxwNRm tQj+QEybwdAn/rcsF3upTBz8D/qkrNrDR7GwlYN8yBW6mUKyuVJ1BXiKJzG7Pw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1644927862; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=jLmvNktLjKZLDEajT4gnxOU2cUPZ7H3kAJOrKsCF5tvJJUQKGCzsjfeC8h2//kbYTnOL8h 62cqQuejO2hKK0FIFL54f/z98ShOmpHBF+VH3uJv6WRPWK8TK/Tkxj7sWHog/BGsdurt8C i+ysYDOwYaSxecdg4yrl8XgZI2B8InKmSUzg+Uu9MPQeqvO4EJz+e1mvJE2o+VJ4nvzgtB Xlf2ap+kjLIBoftKzkAW3evALkS5n7QjpafAKxsKJmH12uu7F9att/E3zFoYSB54j7fZbQ OLL1178l1tt83SgrK8L+KNDfm1x6qZhUZS6GO4m/QNzg4ucHxx6x+agVIbzjZg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.13 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0B7413BA39 X-Spam-Score: -2.13 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: VQk7af9BSL6B Hi guix, It sounds like a good idea, but ISTM we don't need yet another markup syntax if emacs org mode already defines a useful standard that can be adopted. The advantage to org mode style [0] -- in commit commentary as well as tags would be its scrapability -- i.e., ease of writing an extractor/formatter for handy report snippets/pages and web stuff etc., whether implemented using foreign shell or within guix. [0] http://xahlee.info/emacs/emacs/emacs_org_markup.html On +2022-02-02 08:58:18 -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hi, > > Leo Famulari writes: > > > On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 11:54:25AM +0100, Maxime Devos wrote: > >> Hi guix reviewers and committers, > >> > >> WDYT of tagging reviewed patches that look good with a usertag, > >> e.g. 'reviewed-looks-good': > >> > >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?tag=reviewed-looks-good&users=guix > >> > >> then if a committer doesn't have much time to review and hence doesn't > >> subscribe to guix-patches@, but they do trust the reviewer, they can visit > >> that URL to look for reviewed patches that can be applied. > >> > >> There could also be a tag 'reviewed-looks-good2' if the patch appears ok > >> to two reviewers, or a 'reviewed-needs-work', etc. > > > > This is a great idea. I guess we will need to adjust the software that > > runs issues.guix.gnu.org to make use of it, but in the meantime you > > should keep using this tag. Thanks! > > I like it as well. > > Maxim > -- Regards, Bengt Richter