From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id EA3OD0cmwGFLWAAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 07:44:23 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id +DiMC0cmwGGVDAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 06:44:23 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6DD230554 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 07:44:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34274 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzCPE-0003q3-9X for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 01:44:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzBPs-0006ys-Vb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:40:57 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:50578) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzBPr-0004Gw-1Z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:40:56 -0500 Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JHT2r3K3SzF3M0; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:40:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1639978852; bh=Hqg1cMrS1Gl+dfHVDr/QyvAPox815EK/d/wzm2hCKJw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cl0MOC4tHoFSwdIcQLAYATYCxpoxtIahA846f+P+geba8yr1Ze82D1IGaO3ZMDdGe 8lmORgsBkbwIrUpDrmu1BkmiCb84BMI1ZLknBlRUDa5x4kCI6mbUzemc1diCCPKqW1 PT5nrDs/jeA6O9jX/JW/BBVZECKfU6L2D2Ktbvhw= X-Riseup-User-ID: 958DDA52BF5417C9DAC4E7A000A4361A1ED672DA085BA3BB77D7BF12592E0F85 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4JHT2q2hqzz1xmv; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:40:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 04:43:17 +0100 From: raingloom To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: Release v1.4 (or 2.0): process and schedule ? Message-ID: <20211220044317.6bf51fdd@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <87v8zk2fe3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86ilvq5kmf.fsf@gmail.com> <86ilvnh7kt.fsf@gmail.com> <87v8zk2fe3.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=raingloom@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1639982663; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=p3BMq6E2C/nrxRYyojwUTEvTjosDTc4glBFQI6y63o8=; b=SDr2ZLlurMKEDiF8Ic9QR3TdEKqsELQ3LYmTaAXmKSp5iz0jr/2UgBNyeYsWdNTkxuBHhl 0XZhqw7Crbp5px6vojkbjBXBcWmoWhTbwtOp+JhWiiKtH/VVk+hodeK8cBq1uLb8CKfgtX tsVryjFVb3EDMEtErTxOw1RlKmcHwfFNCWXUUnwi95gI5SHTYa5dG9Ft295QqVejrMXd2k R4+GIFis7lDGj64FDqzIxYmTdx9i7UKf7xRzGT7ZUTs9egPGEweaT0UZLZDfGIeu+iAHaQ 3neNekxw9IzMNc6H9FIKShOo42ZOMAJ9J94cFEF9HgLcvgLn/+Kw5F+gBjHOlg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1639982663; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=q4xMo+wpgXRvUUG4JesQgMMIVYvrIgGjqADHkfPE6oLR+dJhcs6uGjqT4Rne9s6rFQvR0K bWuuNuBaVtXyQRi6eArjAhwincyeAb3gDJHgFT2vjRhf+65FkdeKd8BYE0BzFbK1BFZjA6 wTsesjOIxYjPlD4qKvbeqx5hvtLc5C3+dUJnWIkCYUkxpG+6Fm9DRXTlfAIa/rYv6mAWbe xkh73yWqSKVcmJx7w/K1V3KpaizZCY2chSb5x0VRhO1Dw1DBE4Ep4c50Lk05Fr8QPOvOc1 Gud7QzdPjnAhAIz3/8AmbSx8BZPX+yHxqoB/nIlgma/Z2erqln3KaM6YbhbTAw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=cl0MOC4t; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.42 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=cl0MOC4t; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E6DD230554 X-Spam-Score: -1.42 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 7iXfA3LW+OGY On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:12:36 -0500 Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hi Simon, > > zimoun writes: > > > Hi, > > > > Now core-updates-frozen is merged. Now The Big Change [1 ]is done. > > Do we go for v1.4 or v2.0? > > As I've mentioned previously, I'd go for a 1.4.0 release, since > overall we've refined and improved (greatly!) what we already had > rather than introduced something revolutionary. I'd keep a 2.0.0 for > when we have p2p distributed substitutes, a custom graphical tool > and/or integration with the 'Software' application in GNOME, this > kind of big user-facing changes. But that's just my personal opinion > :-). If the majority feels a 2.0.0 is more suitable, I won't mind. Agreed, if we go by something like semver.