From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id OLhXJghVkmABaQEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 05 May 2021 10:19:20 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id KFX8IQhVkmAfCAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 05 May 2021 08:19:20 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52D6922D52 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 10:19:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43048 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leCkZ-0006dK-Im for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 04:19:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leCic-0005lN-45 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 04:17:19 -0400 Received: from marvid.fr ([163.172.81.107]:39490 helo=courriel.marvid.fr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leCiW-0000n2-W2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 04:17:17 -0400 Received: from pine.local (unknown [78.194.167.103]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by sahkopoika (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77DDE5257C06; Wed, 5 May 2021 10:16:40 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=marvid.fr; s=201901; t=1620202600; bh=t/1hZUrzmaIllaz4g5uaTjp3e4QAyfhqZDsyTPF3rFU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=iaGCtV293cSonxg92f1qHwXLRGBUCxKcHgmhWOX/e4zrEZM7FPn2P1+f4RuiaEOkI w5wS7iOYUbFvPFL3s7OhefCeSFlC3/FYFS2Fi6YGg+WIEdUZn9uK3xI1mNqf0DnGa6 74iQi7kZhNyyrQFbvQmBQYoro5ljKJN2dcCZ6CSI= Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 10:16:39 +0200 From: Tissevert To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: GNU Guix 1.3.0rc1 available for testing! Message-ID: <20210505101639.76c3be3f@pine.local> In-Reply-To: References: <877dkjovl6.fsf@gmail.com> <20210503213856.7ac66c26@pine.local> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=163.172.81.107; envelope-from=tissevert+guix@marvid.fr; helo=courriel.marvid.fr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1620202760; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=t/1hZUrzmaIllaz4g5uaTjp3e4QAyfhqZDsyTPF3rFU=; b=tqdTtxuMELzh54Mf7D3E2zo0+PuSXSEo3rPUv62GLBg1pNQWBAXsmeNiG3M881Dz8W1w+q kFF90nVs3UMVgjwc5TX14vbMptxq+paEWXThImwGC6T0AWOAUSKqRMUj66BF0McDM2I1pN vS4aoSF2AD8HlTnjCZ91yCkZSHmVTe04nwJQX07lDXZ47kpnMqrD2S5ZkgyjM3JnMfburZ hSbc3CxHbmx90jXS0v+z3JkoCFQrajwBMfSk1o4KUxJqdEVncVcV3a827SGo9P2tTn+8He 8PDVGUyltNxhc0vRcLKew43rBeaix0ILM0Xz/FFH90UfK94MqzF/Cjr0Wq7pQA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1620202760; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=FGmoCTj6oC1xDUJjZjSR+A7CfyvDsnyzYXZ4v7/cwKUUcLVXGj5vKFDPiJOuAH7ZNYzKJ0 LyjW66WhN5uxFfesYNwajPktJSuG6Kd9h0zRsdQiwZxrONQ3gY+ZMzMSY5lbFgwFwLNd3w PCrdBV32+TqK3mNE5EiZlnmUJMqX9XzVPz/0swFww9UC1PU7IgyPUDLCoy4QuxRg9tt+jd Cu4IPzVcm1aBe5XcLpQyRPBgHuP/YUH03cf0iZDyj4hY8ZYIf1w3W2DGDtFOP8w0jIRrmm o2vfMUwkVLdhDlcjnOTxGuxgYecBim1VxwDlQ6O1j8bcfqUsNkpyUqQYb1ZVRQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=marvid.fr header.s=201901 header.b=iaGCtV29; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.46 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=marvid.fr header.s=201901 header.b=iaGCtV29; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 52D6922D52 X-Spam-Score: -1.46 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: orX404+EFtIH Hi !! On Mon, 3 May 2021 20:34:54 -0400 Leo Famulari wrote: > I think that a big part of why we offer the SysV-init "/etc/init.d" > service management script is to serve Devuan =E2=80=94 there are not many > distros using that style of service management anymore. If `daemonize` > is not available by default on Devuan, I wonder if there is some other > way we should be writing the script. >=20 > Can you check some "Devuan provided" scripts in '/etc/init.d' and see > if they use a different method of daemonizing things? Oh really ? I didn't think devuan was well-known enough for it to have an impact on a design choice like this. Well no other of the 69 scripts I have= in /etc/init.d use daemonize. Most of them use /sbin/start-stop-daemon, althou= gh the point of running Devuan was to have runit, but it's so well hidden you wouldn't know it's PID 1 here=E2=80=A6 which is the main reason why I'm giv= ing up on Devuan, I came for my favourite, easy to use, init system, not for some compat-bloat over it that end up hiding the best feature. So if this script= is only for Devuan, I think a proper runit daemon may be better. Regards, Tissevert