From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id wI0JEh1YIGA3GgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 21:14:05 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id IJEJDh1YIGBnEQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 21:14:05 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13D8A9403A9 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 21:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39652 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8rNc-0000aB-26 for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 16:14:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8rNG-0000Zp-D8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 16:13:42 -0500 Received: from imta-37.everyone.net ([216.200.145.37]:40102 helo=imta-38.everyone.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8rNB-0004TE-A1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 16:13:41 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0004962.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 117L8C19001033; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:13:29 -0800 X-Eon-Originating-Account: ig9GvpnVb8VQSL06LFuFa1pCqWJc4qRudBAbVxPt0lo X-Eon-Dm: m0117124.ppops.net Received: by m0117124.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 53b92772) id m0117124.601839f7.a20ff; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:13:28 -0800 X-Eon-Sig: AQMHrIJgIFf4GMwUwgIAAAAC,e346b1aadb77af667399dcc8b1221987 X-Eip: vYKB1U3VALkSYdYkAk-TVnK4Rmo2RTlS_DnZPZiYKAA Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 22:13:19 +0100 From: Bengt Richter To: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: Would a Guix QA page be helpful? Message-ID: <20210207211319.GA14023@LionPure> References: <87k0rlx823.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k0rlx823.fsf@cbaines.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-02-07_11:2021-02-05, 2021-02-07 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 clxscore=1034 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=796 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102070154 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.200.145.37; envelope-from=bokr@oz.net; helo=imta-38.everyone.net X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Bengt Richter Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.64 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 13D8A9403A9 X-Spam-Score: 0.64 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: GnBRmFG2i9Nr Hi Christopher, tl;dr: +1 :) On +2021-02-06 20:20:04 +0000, Christopher Baines wrote: > Hey, > > The Guix Data Service has been getting better at finding problems, but > getting that data requires knowing it exists, and where to find it, and > clicking all the relevant links. > > I've been wondering if it would be good to have a QA page that just > summarises and links to this information, things like: > > - Broken packages > - Broken system tests > - Broken fixed output package derivations > - Lint warnings > - ... > > While I'd really like to get to a place where less packages and system > tests are unintentionally broken, and less lint warnings are > unintentionally introduced, at the moment, there are plenty of these > problems. There's also things like the broken package sources, where > there will probably always be new breakages being introduced. > > Given the Guix Data Service can look at what's changed within a time > period on a branch, recent breakages could also be displayed. > > This could potentially sit at qa.guix.gnu.org. > > Any thoughts? > Mainly, please represent the info so that a person can get it with wget and extract items with grep or simple tool and inspect with any editor. I.e., some form of structured text. Someone will make a shiny browser interface, but don't please don't make that a dependency for access to the data. And please use '+%F %T ' date format for time stamps, UTC, so one doesn't have to wonder what year it was when looking at an old copy/paste or screen capture ;-) That'd be enough to please me, anyway :) Good tags for searching are helpful, of course. > Thanks, > > Chris -- Regards, Bengt Richter