From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id ONmhOLsZ61/FAgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 11:57:47 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id sBuCNLsZ61+hLQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 11:57:47 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9558D9402A2 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 11:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58090 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kuDdI-0000Ax-NC for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 06:57:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47052) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kuDbk-0000Aq-E7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 06:56:08 -0500 Received: from mout1.freenet.de ([2001:748:100:40::2:3]:56990) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kuDbh-0002Ty-7J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 06:56:08 -0500 Received: from [195.4.92.122] (helo=sub3.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID t_w_@01019freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.92 #3) id 1kuDbb-0008B0-H9; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 12:55:59 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freenet.de; s=mjaymdexmjqk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=l0JX9wVB+SlGRi/P0PLNMFjjCYSDm50wJtdMGnOBDis=; b=w+kjI/8/DzNmZPt4XBqiT7wamw QdVcEIrTl2hFdSAY15thyIqzJ5JY3BJiP+Jw0y+i4AJZGPUVW5o9mouROsBogkixLYOzS0augsgnl dHHQODEo4tcbbQlrgFUW72N+I5qhKBfnIHird7pVi1koMz1mRR6SEwva7edQn6eUcqqByAdVwh1Xn XuXaPM4z//SinJtzG2gBcaw76jYPiUbMOV3SrAzfoHl9pFmNxeyR9P2pWW1vmmp94D3Qg4M4SaEq2 2S9uJ6GNl1pMYs515xkN3xVOUv+Xk/ghQkzcYPYQE355XJ3ATX6cz2XEoaZXkiQWQoZNiZwgBZ77k O/D/73mQ==; Received: from p200300e4f719b700d43ff072767cd2c2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([2003:e4:f719:b700:d43f:f072:767c:d2c2]:32818 helo=charly) by sub3.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID t_w_@01019freenet.de) (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.92 #3) id 1kuDbb-000272-EG; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 12:55:59 +0100 Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 12:55:57 +0100 From: Thorsten Wilms To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Move LV2 plugins to dedicated module? Message-Id: <20201229125557.d1741d0f44d1483f5c29c13d@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <87o8idlxp1.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87o8idlxp1.fsf@elephly.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originated-At: 2003:e4:f719:b700:d43f:f072:767c:d2c2!32818 X-FNSign: v=2 s=FF84D8CAF8EBFBF503DAAE172427D2E87FB32367AE80A7D64C586C701D651A0D Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:748:100:40::2:3; envelope-from=t_w_@freenet.de; helo=mout1.freenet.de X-Spam_score_int: -54 X-Spam_score: -5.5 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.698, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.17 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=freenet.de header.s=mjaymdexmjqk header.b=w+kjI/8/; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9558D9402A2 X-Spam-Score: 0.17 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: ++HVHCuOQ+zH On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 17:09:14 +0100 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > we have a whole bunch of LV2 audio plugins. We don’t have a naming > convention for them (there’s no guarantee the name includes “lv2”) and > we seem to be adding these packages to (gnu packages audio) or (gnu > packages music). > > What do you think about moving them all to a new module? And what do > you think about finding a naming convention, such as beginning the > package name with “lv2-”? Hi! Since noone else more involved chimed in so far: I didn’t even notice that some plugins are in packages/music. I think at at minimum, all audio plugins should be in the same module. Rather audio than music, I’d say. How about one module for both LV2 and LADSPA plugins, though? A naming convention like lv2- would be most welcome. Moving definitions from one module to another won’t affect any installation, right? But I take it name changes break at least the upgrade chain, so users should be made aware of that. -- Thorsten Wilms