From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id iLogOKomv1+oGAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:53:14 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id QOf0M6omv18pPwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:53:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A282094042B for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35664 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ki8LJ-0007U2-KP for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 22:53:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56652) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ki8L3-0007TL-W7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 22:52:58 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:37828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ki8L1-0004N7-Vz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 22:52:57 -0500 Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ChP3f0D17zDt21; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:52:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1606362766; bh=18wZZxoZSwa1MtNTYLm6eu7Qnfaf/vw2PTIYpQAqJ4Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=G6UjTKW2KV//TLcTrV/d6TlgAbKefUR4OxnIxmZZx7OyT7mCEYk9zUPkXB74D+YRj LVPFeRjDO7fqtfyzyAuvb2G4zsoN0/GyIzr6DU13oR6PHwZNNGGT4lVwcnsBxvmSZp B1XcQu/3Fc/fLnRD9Pdzqn2MFtuBcXQfelcGgCwg= X-Riseup-User-ID: B9617AB8C131F6BA6BEBD90B57B2B8C31432ACB5A256540AD4FD72B1FC6A9692 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ChP3c6zPPzJs1s; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:52:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 23:31:53 +0100 From: raingloom To: Michael Rohleder Subject: Re: Thank you for participating in the Guix Day! Message-ID: <20201125233153.7f0281f6@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <87wny9hfvx.fsf@rohleder.de> References: <20201124030056.53f92023@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> <20201124212637.262fffc2@riseup.net> <87wny9hfvx.fsf@rohleder.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=raingloom@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: inc X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=G6UjTKW2; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.71 X-TUID: u0fiX1lXrS39 On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:47:46 +0100 Michael Rohleder wrote: > raingloom writes: > > My only issue was that I had to reconnect audio every 3-4 minutes, > > sometimes having to do a full reload. BBB was nice, but apparently > > it's still pretty heavy. > > I had a similar issue, but only in the break where we had lots of > webcams: After about 5 or 6 webcams, my (slow) net connection became > satturated and BBB seems to loose more and more > informations/connections/gets out of sync. After that, audio didn't > work anymore (but was still transmitted) and I had to > reconnect/reload. > Oh yea, regarding that, I really think it would have made a whole lot more sense if people just sent in a photo, instead of DDoS-ing the network.