From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 0HuvLJv7s19AbwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:34:35 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id n1l7KJv7s19hJAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:34:35 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4353C9402A7 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41510 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf3wA-0005TT-3P for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:34:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf3su-00025U-NB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:31:12 -0500 Received: from dd26836.kasserver.com ([85.13.145.193]:58742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf3ss-0007sG-2Z; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:31:12 -0500 Received: from localhost (80-110-126-103.cgn.dynamic.surfer.at [80.110.126.103]) by dd26836.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69C123360131; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:31:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:31:03 +0100 From: Danny Milosavljevic To: zimoun Subject: Re: Release: Docker Image? DockerHub? skopeo? Message-ID: <20201117173103.31703c84@scratchpost.org> In-Reply-To: <86k0ums3xw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20200922115019.08d40bec@scratchpost.org> <86tuu5fklj.fsf@gmail.com> <20201104155010.0b83ab17@scratchpost.org> <86k0ums3xw.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.7 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/lARiq3.8=M/kxrvtTfeW_av"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Received-SPF: none client-ip=85.13.145.193; envelope-from=dannym@scratchpost.org; helo=dd26836.kasserver.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/17 10:47:58 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.11 X-TUID: FkDd27c+b97K --Sig_/lARiq3.8=M/kxrvtTfeW_av Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 22:30:51 +0100 zimoun wrote: > Wow! The image is huge: >=20 > 5.23GB registry.gitlab.com/daym/guix-on-docker latest 884b4a4ddf61=20 >=20 > Is it expected? Yes, because Docker is silly. It will continue to grow. It should be better when you use an external volume as /gnu/store and /var/= guix. > > Then, the =E2=80=99docker exec=E2=80=99 downloads \o/ and then fails with: > guix pack: error: getting status of `/tmp': No such file or directory >=20 > Hum, as in the other message, I am sure I am missing the obvious with > Docker options. Yeah, someone needs to create /tmp. That someone is not Guix (it would be = weird). /tmp is a common directory, so it does not belong to any of the parts that have been composed, or maybe there should be a standard "/tmp" part? Is there such a standard "/tmp" part in Docker-land? Similarly, but worse, with /etc/passwd, /etc/group, /etc/services and so on. > Currently, it builds master, right? I have not looked but do you think > it could possible to track the both branches master and version-1.x.y? Yes, right now it builds current master. Sure, could easily make it do both. --Sig_/lARiq3.8=M/kxrvtTfeW_av Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAl+z+scACgkQ5xo1VCww uqXGkwf6A0G4Cx+Xnjrxs8veytPfbXAMfCGmn5+QQw3JWUAewtiMQKMxy8+g7uLM BhK7Nsbbu1iZC3GNM/eENULoAir4/xOq1Ko1FyH9EUEPt+JGGJEbd0milXU9ya2y 59uWNqh3VYQLVGT+n/su89TECVVUMCTdub0RkVHfpJYBow1gfkhpxddxZUYHVvkc fwC4wyDIJ5ipOaKi5F75YuRV57S3AyQwILxnz42Bh8gAfwU832fdjywKl65KdlTT Su+7/EMSwITTLB9PF3JFptpGVUAAJV/1U8chq1EOKZUNNn9/aCE3ZCnGkBT1nF8p vU1JMyy5mdPgauN1ttrsucUsaC156w== =qmgz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/lARiq3.8=M/kxrvtTfeW_av--