From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id SG7vNq1IoF+EDwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 17:58:05 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id yKfzMq1IoF/+IAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 17:58:05 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F2F594023B for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 17:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54510 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZe5k-00025d-BX for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:58:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35236) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZe4M-0001U1-8c for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:56:38 -0500 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:37444 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZe4K-0003sN-35; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:56:37 -0500 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A8453605A1; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 18:56:31 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1604339792; bh=MtuPd7JSCxNv/LTJ8oifiMTrm62Twh9dB3LfwbcYjsk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=lNtfEKQofqBcvSePhx/YgIJ7rnRVoQQCfls3IpzStYqcYrbTs67n7v7r4UzhBll7q yFHAczfW3IIOC3+xDddXem/PlxBrdAQuLqEtl8dr9/dEerSzGJ4JBX+rHZ9Vc2aAjb 3T6CzoNpHmek3jSBLc0KJTPU/K8fBeA+Rsm1DLzw= Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 18:56:20 +0100 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" To: Julien Lepiller Subject: Re: Branching for v1.2? Message-ID: <20201102175620.sf4ty42zxrvasys5@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <863630u6ap.fsf@gmail.com> <87zh4f4ukl.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnzj1shv.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0v7yv4l.fsf@gmail.com> <87zh42qbco.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87361r3nfh.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.45.111.108; envelope-from=pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de; helo=mail.pelzflorian.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/02 12:56:32 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Maxim Cournoyer , Mathieu Othacehe , Jakub =?utf-8?B?S8SFZHppb8WCa2E=?= , Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=pelzflorian.de header.s=mail header.b=lNtfEKQo; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.49 X-TUID: 1e0YkN3YE42/ On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:00:38AM -0500, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Le 2 novembre 2020 08:20:34 GMT-05:00, "Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas" a écrit : > >With my translator hat on: a new tarball for TP has to be generated > >before or after creating the branch (1.2.0-pre3). If done tomorrow, I > >think the translations could need a bit later than Friday to catch up; > >Florian and Julien, what do you think? > > I think I can manage the deadline on the 6th if there aren't too > many changes, and we generate the tarball today or tomorrow. […] That would be OK for me. Regards, Florian