From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id +DG/G1fhfV9fKQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 15:40:07 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id wAeoF1fhfV8/RgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 15:40:07 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28BBD940223 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 15:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42358 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQBXy-0006xq-2h for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:40:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQBXY-0006vw-2n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:39:41 -0400 Received: from dd26836.kasserver.com ([85.13.145.193]:49440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQBXW-0005yE-9m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:39:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (80-110-126-103.cgn.dynamic.surfer.at [80.110.126.103]) by dd26836.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FF3C3364CC2 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 17:39:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 17:39:35 +0200 From: Danny Milosavljevic To: Subject: Continuous integration - automatic EMAIL Message-ID: <20201007173935.3f5ee457@scratchpost.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/3w__RdanepCUSi+=ijnuIbu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Received-SPF: none client-ip=85.13.145.193; envelope-from=dannym@scratchpost.org; helo=dd26836.kasserver.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/07 11:36:42 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.11 X-TUID: s4MT6vnVGGB+ --Sig_/3w__RdanepCUSi+=ijnuIbu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, please, let's improve building and testing processes. Please, can we have the build servers send build failures to guix-devel instead of hoping that people check manually? I have other things to do in my life than to poll random servers every few hours. If you don't want to send e-mail on all failures (probably an overwhelming flood at first--that's how bad the current state is!), then I suggest to: Daily do, on each supported architecture (and I mean those packages specifically--it's not an example stand-in): guix pull guix build glibc || mail guix-devel@gnu.org -s "glibc failed" guix build gtk+ || mail guix-devel@gnu.org -s "gtk+ failed" guix build gnome-desktop || mail guix-devel@gnu.org -s "gnome-desktop fai= led" and I mean automatically--not triggered manually by a person. Maybe I'm missing something--but the amount of manual fiddling I have to do which a computer could automate perfectly well is REALLY inefficient. There's nothing fundamental missing--why can't the last obvious step be added so it is actually automatic? --Sig_/3w__RdanepCUSi+=ijnuIbu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAl994TcACgkQ5xo1VCww uqVa6wf/UyKhlhw0dV0ddRggHiBdUS9UPo6+7oqrEpsYQ2qZ0er1N6DT+r2xps1Q fLcJobXSJ1hpbCU3U4kb62dZsIDmxuh7C8n8PTFVrhpjv3D2KIkNeuAfI7YVdPWM XOVNVDptvmZTmZbV+LsYhEcZDSn7dMvcFGXzzMkCjDSXmdG2QzRX+d7Ne0yaGi65 Fhe8S3/w71Srv3llphzmDoKZk+SuCicYh4LMfYZgbeg5eo2jhXv5d/7L9RNx+pTv j+72t7W6+cu+/GeO46g1ayI7UiDSUnYysZinNPDfpW87lux3BJ4GKWJV+wjpysbu OHgOcQ6OrzpkeXh0fJLIAJw++PGXgA== =ty7H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/3w__RdanepCUSi+=ijnuIbu--