From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id bMoZF/UzBl/GLQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 21:00:37 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id MOJnEvUzBl88ZAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 21:00:37 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EBAA9402A2 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 21:00:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41038 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jtHBD-0000HW-F4 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 17:00:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jtHB3-0000H3-2a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 17:00:25 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:48990 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jtHAy-0006bG-QC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 17:00:24 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62A7236055C; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 23:00:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1594242016; bh=ykEIghbs0Q7X1EkJrvExI+Nq1U732CCYbfG6sFQFshg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=q7L/od1qieUeW67CjfPIyjOvw+yOThkz5zHl83nEtk7lAzsSnLa92pmYNUYYA2Lb7 S+BOcSJadlL0ym8iekYLeQVdJYQ8E++6x8T5SX7s4mtiG7Uvp5Lj8QdQy+Ly5uo6fj 7vYr9ETEJpMZ25zWR00p/cxGTLsuexT9qUelwpEs= Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 23:00:05 +0200 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" To: "Cook, Malcolm" Subject: Re: [Guix Website] A Search Page for Packages Message-ID: <20200708210005.cu2uau5lg6vvfrpe@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <8D16121A-E3D6-4A52-ACCA-88C0B50A4D1C@stowers.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8D16121A-E3D6-4A52-ACCA-88C0B50A4D1C@stowers.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.45.111.108; envelope-from=pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de; helo=mail.pelzflorian.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/08 17:00:16 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniela Lura , "guix-devel@gnu.org" Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=pelzflorian.de header.s=mail header.b=q7L/od1q; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: 05azwkBchDnp Yes, this kind of search is much better. Good work! I wonder, can bad people abuse the search for denial-of-service or is the number of searches limited? On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 08:31:37PM +0000, Cook, Malcolm wrote: > * Immediate feedback of hits as you type is “nice”. IMO suggested completion of search times is nicer. This has two sides. I find it great that search works without JavaScript and think users should not normally be required to enable privacy-killing JavaScript. However, search-as-you-type indeed is a nice feature for the JS-enabled users. I do not know how to reasonably implement it though (and in what programming language). Also the improvement of search-as-you-type vs. the current proposal is not big. Regards, Florian