From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id CJX7OVmu+15MCQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 21:27:53 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id gES1NVmu+16HTgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 21:27:53 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA11F940308 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 21:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35346 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jqNnE-0005sp-MM for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:27:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jqNms-0005gl-LY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:27:31 -0400 Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl ([217.74.65.239]:50728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jqNmp-0001b9-JS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:27:30 -0400 X-Interia-R: Interia X-Interia-R-IP: 89.64.43.25 X-Interia-R-Helo: Received: from localhost (89-64-43-25.dynamic.chello.pl [89.64.43.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 23:27:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 23:27:12 +0200 From: Jan Wielkiewicz To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Installer script on Fedora doesn't work properly Message-ID: <20200630232209.1bb69ead@interia.pl> In-Reply-To: <87a70koiy7.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20200630000453.5f64b55b@interia.pl> <87a70koiy7.fsf@elephly.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Interia-Antivirus: OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=interia.pl; s=biztos; t=1593552444; bh=yV2T2un9LFB2oskHUb4fMjKv7UmvA3wsSKSON25ZHd0=; h=X-Interia-R:X-Interia-R-IP:X-Interia-R-Helo:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Interia-Antivirus; b=E68DiCVgXh/8uk2GxwVW7GkFwRZtKNVev5msS9Kx2+T0WDgdAIFLltMtfOulrN2eo q4qzv1XYYWrPR7Rm6amrEMS8gEYT8qZu2GBPuMCbMaszZgGBawFhYPkp0oK6rWw3EQ 5Itk7OWhLFPqKy05GiMfsJbM9ZBZ8Ikf70imtKsY= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.74.65.239; envelope-from=tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl; helo=smtpo.poczta.interia.pl X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/30 17:27:25 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=interia.pl header.s=biztos header.b=E68DiCVg; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.21 X-TUID: JEmvhV59Ord/ On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:07:44 +0200 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >=20 > Hi Jan, Hi! >=20 > This means the daemon isn=E2=80=99t running. >=20 > If you use SELinux in enforcing mode then the daemon is probably > prevented from starting. I'm not aware of this - I just picked all default settings, not that the choice was big. >=20 > Sure. We have a draft SELinux policy for systems like yours, but it > is probably no longer current as Fedora=E2=80=99s SELinux policy is not > frozen in time. I encourage you to try it and help debug it to > adjust it for current versions of Fedora. That's my first day running Fedora, but if someone gives me right directions, I can help. >=20 > These recommendations wouldn=E2=80=99t help in your case. We can=E2=80= =99t feasibly > maintain a farm of different distros (some with SELinux and some > without) where we install Guix all the time. >=20 Even manual testing before making a release would be good. Btw adding checkboxes to the issue tracker would make it easier for everyone. Anyway, Guix should work on disributions considered to be "industry standard" such as Debian, Fedora, etc. What about a list of distributions Guix was tested on in the manual, with a link to it somewhere on the main page. The first impression is really important. Jan Wielkiewcz