From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 9hEvIaqU0V6EWAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 23:03:06 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id h3N8HKqU0V6HCgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 23:03:06 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0CE5940997 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 23:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53146 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jeo1o-0001Li-NO for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 19:03:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37268) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jeo1f-0001LY-LW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 19:02:55 -0400 Received: from dd26836.kasserver.com ([85.13.145.193]:41936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jeo1e-0000zm-8m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 19:02:55 -0400 Received: from localhost (80-110-127-207.cgn.dynamic.surfer.at [80.110.127.207]) by dd26836.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB75F33682D1; Sat, 30 May 2020 01:02:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 01:02:47 +0200 From: Danny Milosavljevic To: Raghav Gururajan Subject: Re: [OUTREACHY]: Integration of desktop environments into GNU Guix Message-ID: <20200530010247.52d4c8dc@scratchpost.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20200506051334.4558e7b3.raghavgururajan@disroot.org> <8c56bfdd-4080-9444-d3c2-7bd962c4c687@disroot.org> <49cc7f39-7bce-f5a1-55da-5f9bca203627@disroot.org> <20200528202359.25c7b096@scratchpost.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/1wupvRx5NhXelp5nTF48swK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Received-SPF: none client-ip=85.13.145.193; envelope-from=dannym@scratchpost.org; helo=dd26836.kasserver.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/29 19:02:51 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.11 X-TUID: y1hFksRk2znz --Sig_/1wupvRx5NhXelp5nTF48swK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Raghav, On Fri, 29 May 2020 17:01:26 -0400 Raghav Gururajan wrote: > > Please if you update the actual package from upstream, mention that fac= t in > > the commit log. If the actual upstream package changes, that's a serio= us > > change, right? People might wanna know where that happens. =20 >=20 > Sure! I usually mention the version update as a part of * gnu/packages > [...]. Should that be enough or do I also mention as a part of gnu: [...]? Also right in front, like "gnu: xxx: Update to 1.2.3.". For better or for worse that's what the majority of our git log looks--nobody does "[version]: Update to 1.2.3.", although it would be technically correct. > IIRC, propagated-inputs are installed along-side the package, whereas, > inputs are not. But I do not see any use of mentioning something in both. I think you did that in one of the packages, though. --Sig_/1wupvRx5NhXelp5nTF48swK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAl7RlJcACgkQ5xo1VCww uqUPmAgAnpdo5GkbFA9iLB+ffEcfZPpD6w7H79Euo9CU8xGu4GSW8R9+PBaWlavM CtUICyLMa0QxCbsnagVm1fwczFaPZiqzoPprDRR+WJLAPCtmKIfKQN/3H78nW+vJ 7IPIbELAQd4MOLHLWM9i2p9c7xIE7cOo2pOzu55tYbAZtQ7vZlrNEsT0MmPx1PzA zClsouOstPEbZxyisycEiIjxafyniWUlBBtqs7PdCCi24uwt1XldMV5IaaQRGsqE pkRFszrC+Tj/Ny87B+r3RhdxbW+0c042GQF/EjRFgg3ZyZ3p+PRISqC55+b2ursg Aj6u9pVLMKBmON2WgAG2mrQd6ORbNw== =rmxR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1wupvRx5NhXelp5nTF48swK--