From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>
Subject: Re: Jami: Bug source investigation
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:54:19 +0200
Message-ID: <20200415205419.11e6a273@kompiuter>
References: <20200409012019.3bf4c121@kompiuter>
	<87blnsiot6.fsf@devup.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54077)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>)
 id 1jOnBC-00010L-9h
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:54:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>)
 id 1jOnBB-0007g6-7h
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:54:34 -0400
Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl ([217.74.65.157]:49022)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>)
 id 1jOnBA-0007ed-LO
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:54:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87blnsiot6.fsf@devup.no>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:31:01 +0200
Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> wrote:

> It looks like this problem was fixed a while back:
> 
> https://trac.pjsip.org/repos/ticket/2240
> https://github.com/pjsip/pjproject/commit/d5a9caf6aac077c157fa6b20c770385c2355973d
> 
> Have you tried updating pjproject to 2.10?

Yes, of course. It seems all pjproject errors look like this :P

Is there a way to use configure flags from rules.mak file provided by
Jami? Currently I use "#:configure-flags" form, but I have to be sure I
didn't miss anything important from the file.


Jan Wielkiewicz