From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pjotr Prins Subject: Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output? Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:59:58 -0600 Message-ID: <20200220215958.ozo4dqzlw6jr7yjf@thebird.nl> References: <87bm90rn22.fsf@dustycloud.org> <20191004154658.5jswjutbcfe6zsig@thebird.nl> <875zl471sp.fsf@dustycloud.org> <877e5k1671.fsf@gmail.com> <87o8yudpcr.fsf@gnu.org> <875zg3ri9s.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <874kvmtkr9.fsf@bendersteed.tech> <878sky191q.fsf@dustycloud.org> <20200220124420.fkmwlf3osp6otrlj@thebird.nl> <87v9o15qq4.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4txW-0004jc-Gl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 17:06:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4txV-0004Lh-Ij for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 17:06:14 -0500 Received: from mail.thebird.nl ([94.142.245.5]:51192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4txV-0004Jf-Bq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 17:06:13 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87v9o15qq4.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 02:32:35PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > At first glance, I don't think the builder would be too hard. > > On a related note, installing racket-minimal, then running > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > raco pkg install drracket > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > works except for the package that bind against glib and cannot find it. > > So when we make the racket build system, we must ensure the bindings are > properly patched in. Pretty cool. Yes, raco works normally.