From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pjotr Prins Subject: Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output? Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 06:44:20 -0600 Message-ID: <20200220124420.fkmwlf3osp6otrlj@thebird.nl> References: <87efdx6nzt.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87pnxgjwfx.fsf@gnu.org> <87bm90rn22.fsf@dustycloud.org> <20191004154658.5jswjutbcfe6zsig@thebird.nl> <875zl471sp.fsf@dustycloud.org> <877e5k1671.fsf@gmail.com> <87o8yudpcr.fsf@gnu.org> <875zg3ri9s.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <874kvmtkr9.fsf@bendersteed.tech> <878sky191q.fsf@dustycloud.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4lIL-0004CQ-PK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:51:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4lIK-0001Dt-FH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:51:09 -0500 Received: from mail.thebird.nl ([94.142.245.5]:50130) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4lIK-0001Co-9I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:51:08 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878sky191q.fsf@dustycloud.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Christopher Lemmer Webber Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 05:55:45PM -0500, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > Am I right then that the challenge is less an "importer" from the Racket > package repository and more to do with how Racket actually installs its > package outputs? Or is it both? At this stage a simple importer and adding packages by hand would work for me. Recursive imports can be done later. Racket is typically not as bad as Rust, Go or Javascript in wanting 100+ dependencies. It would be great if we had a simple builder. Pj.