From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: Packaging pjproject Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 20:42:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20200202184249.GG9517@E5400> References: <20200131154854.5fc5adca@kompiuter> <87sgjvmx13.fsf@devup.no> <20200131172745.7d12ab53@kompiuter> <87h80bo8ig.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200131203445.07a72436@interia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="svZFHVx8/dhPCe52" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52262) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iyKDp-0002JE-Ma for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 13:43:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iyKDo-0005JW-MY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 13:43:53 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:50158) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iyKDo-0004Jb-G4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 13:43:52 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200131203445.07a72436@interia.pl> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan Wielkiewicz Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --svZFHVx8/dhPCe52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 08:35:00PM +0100, Jan Wielkiewicz wrote: > Dnia 2020-01-31, o godz. 18:12:07 > Pierre Neidhardt napisa=C5=82(a): >=20 > > To be more specific, I have never touched pjproject.=20 > Sorry, didn't know that. > > I was the 4th person so work on the Jami patch and I fixed pjproject-ja= mi. =20 > > I sadly have no experience with pjproject beyond that. > Now thats scary :D > pjproject is a ghost package. >=20 > I can try nagging people on pjproject mailing list, but don't know, if > I'm up to the task. What should I ask them? "How to build pjproject > without running make dep" or "Can I build pjproject using system > libraries"? Should I learn more about build systems to be able to fix > this, or is it implementation-dependent? My experience with packaging > so far tells me there is no standard for build systems and every > package is different. Debian does a lot of work with unbundling software, I'd check with them first if they've patched anything to make it work. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --svZFHVx8/dhPCe52 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl43GCUACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1E9EA/+Mf/lTd68xYDWlaGFixjfFZtTJZkOA45IAs2oaaJb9PflFWYLNrx+I7XP dNq3kigqP3gGXgXQI6vdxJ7x2ZqdjM71hP1lTB7Q9FfoR4YXtPzRvBChMnuquaQ3 6cGtcuFIUoHlQIQvXForA8lQMb2JPYfkxBzvYcD2mG31V9WB0rZgS5oqW5lmluU7 IkIq3RnKdS/e3aNfyQpF8hqiW4w/XXh0Q2KfWSN3MbRqVnHBLWwM0Yh3lLQd2Dtu BCYy94xNOdvQgjX8C8FL384j29Quf8cm7ZCRL6qKJgXy0oDwP6RPDp75R/65hM17 5mdUUiLB5SBiyoNl686Xp+DpLDVNbtoZ6qsS3+eFYWl9HFLVLMqNWwKhB3d/BbGY LbX4e/zRCa8d1Crw/RX31SrXoOQTh3qh/w+efK58zBpBYDxKyE6k87g8IJqTa+Hm UfyPxWeGa8ieFrLTg/ZAU1R/FTh7W4YFsHrYLEPqdUmgGL2zugXCfdu1k7Ad76o2 02iPFzHDkHMpJAVn7huMaFWKRRsCjG1a9NrqI4KFtEIWsrqZQavHtt1K46JlmTBz N+a3pzbqULPKPF2CWFjdxUrFkgtrN+q6dE8OY58SPFWnvPsC4fApsNMpqtxNziXh wl/dbZXOp0FgtaSjvjs0WhUPBosczyEYWxtNfSSAv9FKh9/NwD4= =6ShP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --svZFHVx8/dhPCe52--