From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: Packaging Jami progress Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 11:08:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20191225090805.GF23018@E5400> References: <20191215211230.66fea79e@interia.pl> <875zihclep.fsf@elephly.net> <20191222002815.4db8e9ca@interia.pl> <87d0cgpzqo.fsf@elephly.net> <20191223204317.3069e8ba@kompiuter> <20191225023416.0b36b90c@kompiuter> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8sldprk+5E/pDEv" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35707) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ik2fF-00077u-GW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 04:09:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ik2fE-0006SZ-F0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 04:09:09 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:54760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ik2fE-0006D7-8n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 04:09:08 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191225023416.0b36b90c@kompiuter> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --a8sldprk+5E/pDEv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 02:34:16AM +0100, Jan wrote: > Never mind the question about removing not my commits - I rediscovered > the guix pull --rebase option, Pierre showed me previously. >=20 > There's also a problem - don't know if it's a bug or not, but Jami > client encounters an error during screen sharing. I suspect it could be > caused by the gnutls version in our repo - 3.6.9, whereas Jami > developers told me the unpatched 3.6.10 should work finely. > Is there anyone maintaining gnutls? I could try updating it, but for > now I can't resolve some failing tests on 3.6.10 and I would like not > to touch it at all, considering it is a really crucial for security > package - I don't want to make the whole community vulnerable due to a > stupid mistake I could make. >=20 gnutls has too many dependant packages to be updated on the master branch. One option is to create a gnutls-3.6.10 package which inherits =66rom our normal gnutls package and use that until gnutls gets updated on core-updates. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --a8sldprk+5E/pDEv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl4DJvEACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1EzzBAApWfpqiXj72Ku1sfsuEcvCA3vSfMiAvTF+WBIipqHWF4Bc9bkq4lMUR6l R8j3+nOc9qhVXBrXnsKJouTAmqjs+HmcuGSppnmOGjjkK4RA8vKBIGbPXGMs5R8U SvClkhqu3UnLmOakmDbfrlc/8SbwB6M9iGlqFY012d3MfuYQ5eZInYeC84Fltmvb 6+b7Z2vi0NROYDJadCddxFInqiFvOahxWa/6CvGbmiL3Qg20LHVSm9QcFoA0OmVS Ud/Fo4aFZ66l1omiO/+fl5VXD8iuUsC35J4QcFM3LnyYvJJEDyW6GsBtmWUvuWwh ULt7E5YELEMcgCA+X2rhQfPEttn33phK60KUWygLGIPR1BsF/UeP/Le7hnE0NOPF /AkVEZyhm5/Z8aTXnyBCMtc3/anC8BxUcX/EUP2y1XvRWvGktFsHCO8ZJsbpDAW5 TvQOCm6JO6+/3b3H71Aapv1aEOA9scdMvspuBl2jZkugzVC6FRVdcC0Db2jQPkp+ fKK17ln1qrO3r1qHsdps2Rw6zCejSIZ5ikS8FqLAyF6tE8ZThUvuJL4pmn5JJ52T 0LMcsZ9IA9uou7hez9dDu/wtirZMyM0mMqopWhabtjYWmM6lwBT/fSl6nqdYnYlo 29RYum3FnY/PRfwVhnd1lnKZSXVV1OkDZocsFwUC2bU45pcY1A8= =8YM5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8sldprk+5E/pDEv--