From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: Guix and FSDG Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:59:58 +0000 Message-ID: <20191122145958.zfwljwiw43jl4cat@uptimegirl> References: <91c877cfe5d19d192b53da2c7cd2a741c30a37f7.camel@disroot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38792) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iYAQd-0005LI-VF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:01:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iYAQc-0005ng-Gi for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:00:59 -0500 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:34180) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iYAQb-0005n7-1H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:00:58 -0500 Received: from [10.9.9.202] (helo=mailfront20.runbox) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iYAQY-0008Mc-J4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:00:54 +0100 Received: by mailfront20.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated alias (882477)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1iYAPf-0002p2-Ba for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 15:59:59 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <91c877cfe5d19d192b53da2c7cd2a741c30a37f7.camel@disroot.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org > Therefore, Guix DOES violate FSDG in this aspect. If you search the mailinglist archives you can see that you are not the first to try and roll up this argument. Ludovic, Ricardo or any of the other Guix maintainers will probably answer more in detail, but my short reply is that we've had this discussion before.