From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tanguy Le Carrour Subject: Re: gnu: python: Update to 3.8.0. Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:03:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20191113080323.u2xfipa43dhecr3w@rafflesia> References: <2b50f965-cbb2-d476-ceaf-2f00323fb50f@goebel-consult.de> <20191023125104.s3xvjegaufjjt4no@rafflesia> <20191030160430.4zdmlsnkoq5ps6tq@rafflesia> <20191030180150.k2txz37uffgu777k@melmoth> <87zhhgo6ms.fsf@devup.no> <20191104091536.5zgt4c5knjsjff6m@rafflesia> <20191104105042.uqktsuev7573dw7w@rafflesia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34208) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iUnce-0003ex-7a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 03:03:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUncd-0000sP-52 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 03:03:28 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:39309) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUncc-0000s5-VO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 03:03:27 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke , =?utf-8?B?R8OhYm9y?= Boskovits Cc: Guix-devel Hi Marius, hi Gábor! Le 11/04, Gábor Boskovits a écrit : > Tanguy Le Carrour ezt írta (időpont: 2019. nov. 4., H, 11:50): > > Le 11/04, Gábor Boskovits a écrit : > > > Tanguy Le Carrour ezt írta (időpont: 2019. nov. 4., > > > > `./pre-inst-env guix build --rounds=2 python@3.8` always fails with: > > > > """ > > > > output ‘/gnu/store/…-python-3.8.0’ of ‘/gnu/store/…-python-3.8.0.drv’ > > > > differs from previous round > > > > """ > > […] > > First time I hear of diffoscope! I had a look at the output (html > > attached), but couldn't make sense of it! > Nice, one thing that looks problematic is that there seems to be a mismatch > in the hash. > At one line you can see the shabang modified to a different path... > I don't yet know the reason of that, but it quite suspicious... > One thing, when dealing with things like like this, one should first fix > the readable differences, > and only then dig deeper, as fixing those often cascade, and fix more than > anticipated. Sorry it took me so long, but I finally had some time yesterday evening to go through the report! I found 4 types of errors: 1. `stat` reporting a different "Birth" for folders, which I assume are perfectly normal. 2. different paths for `python3.8` in the shebang of some scripts. 3. different paths in prefix for `python3.8` (some origin as above). 4. everything else is "Max report size reached"! I don't really know where to go from here? Am I supposed to investigate errors of type 4?! Regards, -- Tanguy