From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>
Subject: Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 19:27:12 +0100
Message-ID: <20191103192712.1f809410@kompiuter>
References: <20191018205608.45b264dc@kompiuter>
 <20191101132929.72495778@interia.pl> <87bltsommk.fsf@devup.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38348)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>)
 id 1iRKar-0002St-9T
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 13:27:18 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>)
 id 1iRKaq-00032b-89
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 13:27:17 -0500
Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl ([217.74.65.236]:44701)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>)
 id 1iRKap-00031P-Ky
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 13:27:16 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87bltsommk.fsf@devup.no>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Sun, 03 Nov 2019 19:12:03 +0100
Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> wrote:

> You can safely ignore the 'read only' messages, they are actually just
> warnings.

Good to know, so they get applied anyway, no matter if read-only?

> The problem is that 2/3 hunks in the patch for
> pjnath/src/pjnath/ice_strans.c failed -- I would guess Jami needs a
> different version of pjproject, or the patches are applied in the
> wrong order?

Already using the proper version of pjproject, so the order seems
to be the problem, thanks a lot! I'll ask the developers about the
order.



Jan Wielkiewicz