From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Wielkiewicz <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>
Subject: Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 13:01:39 +0100
Message-ID: <20191101130139.6193f6df@interia.pl>
References: <20191018205608.45b264dc@kompiuter>
 <20191031211919.175c3f29@interia.pl> <87bltwpn4w.fsf@devup.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60693)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>)
 id 1iQVcn-0006FR-9F
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 08:01:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>)
 id 1iQVcl-0007A7-Sx
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 08:01:53 -0400
Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl ([217.74.65.236]:57558)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>)
 id 1iQVcl-00074G-9i
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 08:01:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87bltwpn4w.fsf@devup.no>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Dnia 2019-10-31, o godz. 23:26:39
Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> napisa=C5=82(a):

> Do you have a link to the patches that Jami/pjproject needs?
You can find patches in the ring-project/daemon/contrib/src/pjproject
directory from the latest source tarball here:
https://dl.jami.net/ring-release/tarballs/

> It would be great if we could use system versions of GnuTLS and cURL,
> because otherwise Jami risks not getting security updates.
A bit unlikely, they update dependencies quickly, but they're slower
than upstream. Keeping a separate version and updating it paralelly
will prevent breaking the build process of the modified pjproject
version.=20

> If they really need special patched versions of some libraries, you
> can do something along these lines to create a
> cusctm variant:
>=20
> (define-public gnutls/jami
>   (hidden-package
>    (package/inherit
>     gnutls
>     (source (origin
>               (inherit (package-source gnutls))
>               (patches (append (origin-patches gnutls)
>                                (search-patches
> "gnutls-jami.patch"))))))))
Why can't we just keep paralell version for a package? Like=20
gnutls @ 3.6.7, gnutls @ 3.6.9 etc?  =20

> I realize now that this won't do the right thing wrt grafts, but we
> can deal with that later.  :-)
Don't really know what grafts are yet, so we can indeed skip this
now :)


Jan Wielkiewicz