From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Wielkiewicz Subject: Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 01:24:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20191027012445.636b1070@interia.pl> References: <20191018205608.45b264dc@kompiuter> <87ftjpyhsz.fsf@devup.no> <87mudxhzv8.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191019223821.71b6dd45@interia.pl> <87a79vd4ee.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <8736fgn9zu.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191025214435.4a0892a8@interia.pl> <87imoblsrn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37689) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iOs4u-00043y-8L for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 19:36:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOs4s-0002wu-KB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 19:36:08 -0400 Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl ([217.74.65.239]:51563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOs4s-0002w0-1S for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 19:36:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87imoblsrn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Dnia 2019-10-26, o godz. 12:12:44 Pierre Neidhardt napisa=C5=82(a): > Nice, thank you for getting in touch with the developers, this is > very informative. >=20 > Have you tried using pjproject > 5dfa75be7d69047387f9b0436dd9492bbbf03fe4 ? > Does the patching still fail? I've tried this today and it still fails. Don't know if the fails with the exact commit are much different from 2.9 fetched from the tarball. If they're not different, then you can see what happens in one of my comments here https://git.ring.cx/savoirfairelinux/ring-project/issues/691 > Also it now depends on Restinio, I think we are missing this one, so > it would need to be packaged first. (But that's unrelated to the > patch issue.) I'm going to package it eventually, but for now I want to fix the current problems and then proceed with the rest. Jan Wielkiewicz