From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>
Subject: Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 00:37:19 +0200
Message-ID: <20191020003719.291dcf2c@kompiuter>
References: <20191018205608.45b264dc@kompiuter> <87ftjpyhsz.fsf@devup.no>
 <87mudxhzv8.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191019223821.71b6dd45@interia.pl>
 <87sgnojw4f.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59265)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>)
 id 1iLxLr-0002J1-6S
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 18:37:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>)
 id 1iLxLq-0000im-1p
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 18:37:35 -0400
Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl ([217.74.65.239]:59359)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>)
 id 1iLxLp-0000hy-ET
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 18:37:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87sgnojw4f.fsf@elephly.net>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 22:52:58 +0200
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:

> We always try to unbundle libraries, because that ensures that all
> packages benefit from security fixes.
> 

Great, so I have to package everything recursively :)
Just to make it clear, because I'm a bit unfamiliar with build systems
and the package API - will packing every library pjproject uses and
just adding it in the "inputs" field make building possible, or will I
have to do magic and copy built packages into "third_party" folder in
the pjproject source tree?

Also what if pjproject (or any package I want to update) depends on a
specific version of a library? Should I just update the package, or
should I add a separate version of the library?


Jan Wielkiewicz