From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo
 documentation?
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 21:35:27 +0100
Message-ID: <20191015203527.GA22658@mintstar>
References: <CAKPWYQ3WWUTG=RcA1RrZ=yb4Shwh5ehzpQAO-32r_WEk7M58eQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87a7h8u4r4.fsf@gnu.org> <20190402150245.GA30067@darkstar>
 <256d60e8-0148-1dd3-4c9d-86e14b42060b@bothner.com>
 <20190407162804.GA28500@darkstar.example.net>
 <87k1g4v8dq.fsf@gnu.org>
 <20190413162121.GA28137@darkstar.example.net>
 <CAKPWYQ1KCUnZHGHL6pr49yASHzhyyGXHBMjoYQ8mVhPUjvfBLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <v5s9AtIUZF8fvQpM5b5kt9IW4xXtpSMyJg1KfKrbxVUYrtqDrE9vQTEkT36KBZLlrevfcc-M_fUlGIFesFOG59g7ZBuib46TFQrlmlmrsl0=@protonmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <bug-texinfo-bounces+gnu-bug-texinfo2=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <v5s9AtIUZF8fvQpM5b5kt9IW4xXtpSMyJg1KfKrbxVUYrtqDrE9vQTEkT36KBZLlrevfcc-M_fUlGIFesFOG59g7ZBuib46TFQrlmlmrsl0=@protonmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-texinfo>,
 <mailto:bug-texinfo-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-texinfo@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-texinfo-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-texinfo>,
 <mailto:bug-texinfo-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-texinfo-bounces+gnu-bug-texinfo2=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-texinfo"
 <bug-texinfo-bounces+gnu-bug-texinfo2=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: P <pronaip@protonmail.com>
Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>, Texinfo <bug-texinfo@gnu.org>
List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 08:20:14PM +0000, P wrote:
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 7:27 PM, Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@gmail.com> wrote:
> > WebKitGTK seemed to be the best option for a lightweight embedded
> > web-browser. I looked into other options, such as the Gecko engine
> > used inside Thunderbird, but apparently it is not supported any more
> > to embed it in other programs. WebKitGTK allowed access to the DOM
> > tree of the documents without the complication of communicating with
> > embedded JavaScript, as was needed with QtWebEngine.
> >
> 
> Out of curiosity, have you looked at smaller browser engines, such as Dillo or Netsurf?

I hadn't looked at either of them.  Do you know if they can be embedded 
inside another program and allow access to the DOM tree of the web page?