From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: moderation, please Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 18:00:38 +0000 Message-ID: <20191012180038.gb5xpee3r4p2lg5h@uptimegirl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJLhv-0006Ww-Ai for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:01:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJLht-0007vY-MS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:01:34 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:42150) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJLht-0007up-Fy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:01:33 -0400 Received: from [10.9.9.203] (helo=mailfront21.runbox) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJLhp-000143-RV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 20:01:29 +0200 Received: by mailfront21.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated alias (882477)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1iJLh8-0000oU-49 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 20:00:46 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi, this list is to discuss the _development_ of GNU Guix, Shepherd, and Guix System. It is not a general discussion list for everything else. While we usually get by fine without imposing moderation restrictions, I don't see how any of the recent message floods have been ontopic to this list (other than the original announcement of the blog post which started the comments from people who don't seem to contribute much else). If it isn't already on moderation for some people, it would be very kind to do so as numerous active people asked for this (and the people in question are on record not willing to stop the messages). Thanks.