From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Louis Subject: Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 05:45:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20191010034525.GO20430@protected.rcdrun.com> References: <10b9ef2f-981d-c4cd-0144-c351ee311ed8@frantovo.cz> <874l0k8c9f.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59139) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iIPOT-0006qt-HR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:45:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iIPOS-0006zJ-5u for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:45:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874l0k8c9f.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix-devel , help-guix@gnu.org * Ludovic Court=C3=A8s [2019-10-07 17:41]: > Hi Franti=C5=A1ek, and welcome, >=20 > (I=E2=80=99m willing to answer questions like I wrote, but if we are to = have a > more in-depth conversation, I think we should not abuse guix-devel for > that.) Now is too late, you are the one who abused Guix, and you should step down and resign from Guix. You are the one who is bringing hatred and separation in community. GNU project is RMS's project. Step down, resign, make your own project. Stop destroying GNU project with money that GNU project is providing for the Guix infrastructure. > Franti=C5=A1ek Ku=C4=8Dera skribis: >=20 > > you speak about =E2=80=9Ebehavior=E2=80=9C in that blog post. But wha= t is more > > important is whether there are any essential, factual > > differences. What would you do differently? What is your program, you= r > > goals? Could you declare it clearly and honestly? Could you guarantee= , > > that you will be faithful to it for decades? > > > > Recently I wrote an article about the future of the FSF: > > . Please read it and say whether you > > agree with particular items or not. >=20 > Note that the FSF and GNU are two different things. GNU is not a forma= l > organization (like US 501(c) or similar), whereas the FSF is. The FSF > is primarily concerned with activism, whereas GNU is concerned with > making those ideas practical. I see you have some legal knowledge. You should better review the legality of the criminal act of defamation that you committed. Your statements are pure ignorance on what you have done to GNU project, and you are trying to change the subject.=20 > Not surprisingly, I agree with all the goals you propose for the FSF, > except perhaps one: to not =E2=80=98mix our ideas with general politics= =E2=80=99. I > think free software is a social movement that doesn=E2=80=99t exist in = a vacuum, > it=E2=80=99s politic in nature, and thus it=E2=80=99s part of =E2=80=98= general politics=E2=80=99. You please RESIGN from GNU project. Move your stuff elsewhere. Jean I am asking those people who are pretending to represent all of the GNU project and who are defaming and slandering RMS[1] to step down and resign, do your software hacking somewhere else, you do not deserve funding that RMS is giving you. Ludovic Court=C3=A8s, Ricardo Wurmus, Matt Lee, Andreas Enge, Samuel Thibault, Carlos O'Donell, Andy Wingo, Jordi Guti=C3=A9rrez Hermoso, Mark Wielaard, Ian Lance Taylor, Werner Koch, Daiki Ueno, Christopher Lemmer Webber, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, John Wiegley, Tom Tromey, Jeff Law, Han-Wen Nienhuys, Joshua Gay, Ian Jackson, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, Andrej Shadura, Zack Weinberg, John W. Eaton, RESIGN and step down from GNU projects, disassociate yourself, find another house for your excessive and uncrontollable fear of the free speech.