From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Subject: Re: Guix beyond 1.0: =?utf-8?B?bGV04oCZcw==?= have a roadmap! Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 06:51:19 +0200 Message-ID: <20190629045119.nhwtozjesqusuvyx@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <877e97vws8.fsf@gnu.org> <20190629013522.436t4eee6q4ppaac@cf0> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46545) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hh5Kd-0002DM-RB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 00:51:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hh5Kc-0000CR-NB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 00:51:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190629013522.436t4eee6q4ppaac@cf0> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ison Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 07:35:22PM -0600, ison wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 06:05:27PM +0200, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > > What do *you* want Guix to address in the future? >=20 > How about a --with-version flag for guix build and guix package? > Sort of like the convenience features --with-source and --with-input fo= r re-writing package fields but this would be convenient for rewriting th= e package version string. >=20 +1 This is . Regards, Florian