From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: Packaging Sagemath Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:33:10 +0200 Message-ID: <20190618113310.GA24454@jurong> References: <20190618080921.GA2041@jurong> <87wohjql72.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20190618113006.GA20603@jurong> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdCMb-0000J6-HO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 07:33:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdCMX-000851-Ar for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 07:33:18 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1]:51454) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdCMT-00081r-TU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 07:33:14 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190618113006.GA20603@jurong> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > We may as well delete the packaged > items (as I have been doing for two or three I just packaged now), and > leave only TODO items. Well, no; I have actually kept packages that I did not yet add to my preliminary sage recipe, be they available or not. It is just that I have been packaging "in order", with every new package immediately added to sage and then deleted from the list. Andreas