From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: Digimend kernel drivers for Guix
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 09:24:08 +0200
Message-ID: <20190529072408.GA1806@jurong>
References: <24EBF066-DEB0-4D52-85F4-7D67F3E0A046@firemail.cc>
	<878suqqvw6.fsf@nckx> <875zpuqvie.fsf@nckx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56751)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1hVswc-00030C-D2
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 03:24:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1hVswb-0006PO-Li
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 03:24:18 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1]:37370)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1hVswa-0006BQ-Ph
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 03:24:17 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <875zpuqvie.fsf@nckx>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Marlon <mbmattos1113@firemail.cc>

Hello Tobias,

you do not like false things, do you?

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 08:33:29PM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> > However, in this case, please use the even simpler:
> >              (arguments
> >   '(#:tests?))                    ; no test suite
> 
> Not sure what went wrong here, but this should obviously be:
>  (arguments
>   '(#:tests?))                    ; no test suite

  (arguments
   '(#:tests? #f))                    ; no test suite

Andreas