From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: ci.guix.info 504 gateway timeout (was Re: guix package builds, subsitutes and --no-build) Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 13:56:47 -0500 Message-ID: <20190304185647.GA21189@jasmine.lan> References: <87pnrm76ta.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> <20190220214442.GA22965@jasmine.lan> <871s416umx.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> <87ef80trpm.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7ik57xs.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> <87fts4rlgc.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57325) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h0slo-0007jR-ER for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 13:57:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h0sll-0006Yk-Us for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 13:57:00 -0500 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:34415) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h0sll-0006TJ-Jn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 13:56:57 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fts4rlgc.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 11:06:32AM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > I don't know about berlin, but hydra.gnu.org has *never* successfully > built ungoogled-chromium. So far, it has made 3 attempts on > x86_64-linux and 5 attempts on i686-linux: [...] > If the same is true on berlin.guixsd.org, that would explain the lack of > binary substitutes. Berlin did build it, soon after the package was first added. I used the substitute on my machine which lacks the capacity build the package. --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlx9dOwACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgidxAApMfRp58vU3GAOw96561XuE+51Hp82k052IMiShIFW/6mfhUg/XiRc+cS ey2tH+I5Wl2ZicxH3R/+BVg/Swpj3VW/f3qPJ29ggaugeGnvZdLTzmivwlntnerK R88TuLAJUaTfwgBU10oWJfy1Kr4Xhh923srwvTnD4/8CB8fQeMMF8bkkdufrSEyy BX0lcctzKXZsKLwXjxl2yN0zRm2+jxYr0B8AFvjYiGlriwieyNjYRFIjiWcrRaz4 jIEGSKZA/SW8uD69UszB+DTR2RZGNTe6JsXnkgMOoy7e7bEaq/o8ieoBr7Q6ISlB ags6oO5Jgi66ERiEs2eR+CIAWzev44nbukZfGrRxUIGrUzfhdTxb109Pf+4p6FiC VLYoslTV9t/ovJy71E0YQJtEgdyI8Z9C5M81nT2idsvglcyq0ZHsb6GOL2QBu0ck FnqHl0PXeN5p9WAaWFWjNFAirG25uysGfGSUzw2yGsvXZiysyrvjz7g4tKiEb6Yw cSZ8x+hCZpnq5/ZP5AnNVOFvDSb9tMNd8OOOfjVodAE90RBP1TbGCvNl1Vk8q9sH /XykBFE9j+JGS++BlDFaIKO9VBLJbCkzxL2GcFx4S+UjA0j0xIJZeJ69W/UM7tNe KLWQxFX4dQfU+XrlgUWNtKZpxy/8tG7oxIV/9AVcQdUe5R9xYrA= =5pW7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--