From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#25970: mozjs build failure Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:10:19 -0500 Message-ID: <20190226221019.GA29866@jasmine.lan> References: <20170305014013.GB16324@jasmine> <20190204222705.GA9103@jasmine.lan> <20190219213103.GA3037@jurong> <20190219214353.GA5986@jasmine.lan> <87lg22fm5q.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50747) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gylBU-00024S-Cy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:26:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gylBT-0004h2-Py for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:26:44 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:60765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gylBR-0004cy-Su for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:26:42 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lg22fm5q.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Vong Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 02:18:57AM +0800, Alex Vong wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: >=20 > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:31:03PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > >> the package builds, but I see no need to keep it. Do you agree to remo= ve > >> it together with mozjs@17? The latter would require a little work, sin= ce > >> all other mozjs packages inherit from it. If there is consensus, I can > >> look into it. > > > > I agree, we don't need to keep any unused mozjs packages. >=20 > Are we keeping the latest version of mozjs? It can be useful for running > javascript (like node and gjs). Yes, I think we should keep the latest version. --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlx1uUYACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgx5w//UN7G59oKnviS8A+h/XsGr6yA7qGxcjmdp0MXxydi8ES/P1fpLERqj5Gz uos+3ZRbnSJqq1P2ZfRMe1V+DbRkA+eyJ4jhBjYVJpw0NLryljGydcg3xXIaYzli Y4IwddyA3XKw8KIlNNmD/AZ4TpRnVUHu+eceu/jsCV/ms/8ukeGaPlmnlmIasWV8 aIqZq0lt39boxkhWSNxbFblTgRuW6Tp3WJGYmdzzlIYFo9DTK1Ap9eL91Pyc0ad1 kzRDjJSngUgY4+honyjEDF8XGnmzWMQvxrYt3OU0o3I4K86U8aw7jSfkq2Wljmve X1DKQGA9M3w1lpMq5HMAiOU0HGtYxlx9Z3zqr3riUcP6TriOjKHrXQsqL20FBqZ+ IPcLVHKQZjrnG6kxg6rKSNM7FMAVonr/q6uiEuWV+yxqYuVQ1DkkiCtOi+nGO3oZ mtPvk4bmwopxE4hYjCQXBHvtwF01hhrbJeXArfXq7XDnzQsGMldtBCt7PqF9R6Jb mO8mV2+3GJPhZQddzbygI2vqkYztLRzLLmsRxcxFwDMHpAHOqSUfCUXqL1698aq4 RE39HWyzL8E0BL3zp34l5Le1JkXojVcKzrf90ShPnAkbUE0J833dG7uF0uj/SWps v9rOrzYYeK/cx+Xjz6kjLKadhn6JTd93+V4mnGqLVvvw7lgQxpw= =KO/n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP--