From: bill-auger <bill-auger@peers.community>
To: gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ungoogled-chromium.
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 02:43:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190217024330.65169c55@parabola> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b742589-eaf4-abf7-3ebf-29d503aeee24@riseup.net>
the difference there is that chromium is not one piece of software
written by one person or even one modestly sized team - it is a
conglomeration of perhaps 100s of different projects written by perhaps
1000s of authors - for some files, it may not actually be known who the
author is, never mind which license they chose, or when - the word
"trust" comes into play there, because it is not clear that any one
single person on the chromium team can honestly account for everything
in the code-base, much less to authoritatively vouch for all of the
authors and various licensing
it is a more reasonable argument to make for projects with a much,
much fewer number of files and many, many fewer devs; but i think a
program this size is far beyond the benefit of reasonable doubt - and,
of course, on the other hand, if the project had many fewer files and
many fewer devs, then a comprehensive audit would not be as absurdly
difficult - so i think that is a moot point in this case
per your analogy, this is more like the owners of one building giving
you permission to go anywhere in the city, because they believe that
every other building in the city shares their trespassing policy -
though, they can not themselves, demonstrate that they have precise
knowledge of the exact number of buildings in the city, nor who their
owners are, nor their owners' trespassing policies
o/c someone could probably raise exactly the same doubts about mozilla -
luckily for us though, we are not aware of any, and so are not yet so
uncomfortably compelled to address them
most importantly, i personally dont care to argue for nor against
chromium - i just want all FSDG distros to agree on how it should be
treated, regardless of what that entails
if we can not all agree on how to interpret the FSDG, and apply it
uniformly to all distro, then the FSDG endorsement has no value and the
FSDG work-group serves no meaningful purpose to the world - we may as
well just go our own separate ways, and satisfy our own individual
fancies
that is what is truly at stake here - not this particular: "yet another
web browser"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-17 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87y3qvb15k.fsf@fastmail.com>
2019-02-02 19:20 ` [PATCH] gnu: Add ungoogled-chromium Marius Bakke
2019-02-03 18:16 ` Joshua Branson
2019-02-04 4:52 ` bill-auger
2019-02-04 5:52 ` brettg
2019-02-04 7:46 ` Ineiev
2019-02-04 10:56 ` bill-auger
2019-02-04 14:43 ` Jean Louis
2019-02-04 12:26 ` [GNU-linux-libre] " Julie Marchant
2019-02-04 15:03 ` bill-auger
2019-02-04 22:34 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-02-06 21:04 ` [GNU-linux-libre] " Marius Bakke
2019-02-07 23:52 ` Christopher Lemmer Webber
2019-02-07 23:59 ` Julie Marchant
2019-02-16 8:00 ` bill-auger
2019-02-16 10:25 ` Brett Gilio
2019-02-16 14:18 ` Julie Marchant
2019-02-16 15:37 ` [GNU-linux-libre] " Adam Van Ymeren
2019-02-16 19:47 ` Adonay Felipe Nogueira
2019-02-16 20:01 ` Brett Gilio
2019-02-16 20:06 ` Brett Gilio
2019-02-17 1:39 ` bill-auger
2019-02-17 22:33 ` [GNU-linux-libre] " Ricardo Wurmus
2019-02-18 12:05 ` bill-auger
2019-02-18 12:15 ` Hartmut Goebel
2019-02-18 13:44 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2019-02-18 19:22 ` Simon Nielsen
2019-02-19 20:45 ` [GNU-linux-libre] " bill-auger
2019-02-16 20:07 ` Alex Griffin
2019-02-17 1:49 ` bill-auger
2019-02-17 1:37 ` bill-auger
2019-02-17 2:30 ` Julie Marchant
2019-02-17 2:42 ` bill-auger
2019-02-17 4:19 ` Julie Marchant
2019-02-17 7:43 ` bill-auger [this message]
2019-02-17 14:06 ` Julie Marchant
2019-02-18 7:43 ` bill-auger
2019-02-17 20:55 ` Christopher Lemmer Webber
2019-02-16 11:16 ` Gábor Boskovits
2019-02-16 12:55 ` ng0
2019-02-16 13:10 ` Gábor Boskovits
2019-02-18 13:47 ` Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
2019-02-16 15:10 ` znavko
2019-02-16 15:50 ` Marius Bakke
2019-02-16 16:20 ` [GNU-linux-libre] " Amin Bandali
2019-02-16 16:33 ` Marius Bakke
2019-02-16 19:27 ` Amin Bandali
2019-02-17 2:20 ` bill-auger
2019-02-16 16:34 ` Alexandre Oliva
2019-02-16 16:54 ` Marius Bakke
2019-02-17 3:38 ` bill-auger
2019-02-16 18:56 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2019-02-19 16:28 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2019-02-09 14:04 ` Adonay Felipe Nogueira
2019-02-03 20:21 ` Amin Bandali
2019-02-05 5:22 ` [bug#28004] " swedebugia
2019-02-12 15:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Marius Bakke
2019-02-18 22:43 ` [bug#28004] " Marius Bakke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190217024330.65169c55@parabola \
--to=bill-auger@peers.community \
--cc=gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).