From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bill-auger Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ungoogled-chromium. Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 20:39:33 -0500 Message-ID: <20190216203933.218dfb67@parabola> References: <20190202192023.22087-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <87k1igpwk8.fsf@dismail.de> <20190203235204.63970587@parabola> <87sgx3mbcq.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvhf5f8d.fsf@dustycloud.org> <20190216030021.374f4c82@parabola> <87va1kav33.fsf@posteo.net> <87lg2f5wqk.fsf@posteo.net> <87k1hz5wh8.fsf@posteo.net> Reply-To: Workgroup for fully free GNU/Linux distributions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87k1hz5wh8.fsf@posteo.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gnu-linux-libre-bounces+gldg-gnu-linux-libre=m.gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: "gnu-linux-libre" To: gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 14:06:43 -0600 Brett wrote: > I think you can probably go ahead and push that patch > Bill, What do you think here? i think that would be intentionally creating exactly the same unpleasant situation as the pureos bug report that stood for many months, unaddressed i think that IF this is the proper course of action, then we should apologize to pureos for asking them to remove it last year but let me rephrase that more plainly: if we do not FIRSTLY apologize to pureos for asking them to remove chromium and publicly endorse them to re-instate it, then endorsing it into guix would be hypocritical and shameful